Search for: "Foy v. State" Results 81 - 100 of 208
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Apr 2016, 4:00 am by Administrator
R v Sargent, 2016 ABCA 104 [17] This Court has previously stated that smuggling drugs into a penal institution should be treated as an aggravating factor: R v Gargas, 2013 ABCA 245 (CanLII) at para 7. [read post]
21 Jun 2015, 4:08 pm by INFORRM
  What harmony” Disharmony extends to one third of the Data Protection Regulation” – pointing out the degree of disagreement between Member States prior to the meeting. [read post]
4 Dec 2023, 2:21 am by INFORRM
In this re-hearing of the Appellant’s appeal, the court had to decide whether the FOI request was lawfully denied. 5RB summa [read post]
6 Aug 2007, 11:51 am
Both the Information Commissioner and the Tribunal accept that names, work phone numbers and work e-mail addresses of staff members are personal data under the Data Protection Act, and therefore covered by the exemption in section 40 of the FOI Act. [read post]
18 Dec 2023, 3:05 am by INFORRM
On 15 December 2023, as stated above, Fancourt J handed down judgement in favour of the claimants in the case of The Duke of Sussex and Ors v MGN Limited [2023] EWHC 3217 (Ch). [read post]
1 Jul 2011, 11:01 am
The FoI Act provides a number of exemptions to allow secrecy to be maintained. [read post]
14 Sep 2010, 11:48 pm by INFORRM
They have far more power than many public agencies, local councils and the rest, which are covered by FOI legislation. [read post]
27 May 2015, 3:46 pm
The State invited her to be director in large schools in the central region of Porto Alegre (near where we lived), but she also never accepted. [read post]
1 Nov 2020, 4:35 pm by INFORRM
 The Guardian had a piece “Key federal agency cleared of intimidating FOI website Right to Know”. [read post]
7 Feb 2024, 5:15 pm by Administrator
Reilly, 2021 SCC 38, at para. 3; see also R. v. [read post]
19 Apr 2018, 8:00 pm by Katitza Rodriguez
” Canada should take the lead from the  United States federal court’s decision in Sandvig v. [read post]
5 Oct 2022, 4:00 am by Administrator
Brown, 2022 SCC 18 [2] At common law, automatism is “a state of impaired consciousness, rather than unconsciousness, in which an individual, though capable of action, has no voluntary control over that action” (R. v. [read post]
12 Sep 2010, 11:59 am by INFORRM
The Blair Memoirs and FOI, The Campaign for Freedom of Information, Press Release – 6 Sep 2010. [read post]