Search for: "Francisco Marte v. State of Maryland"
Results 1 - 6
of 6
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Mar 2009, 11:08 am
And, it is very possible the Supreme Court will disagree with the distinction the Ninth Circuit draws between the Maryland pay-or-play statute, which only impacted Wal-mart in the state, and the San Francisco ordinance at issue, and reverse the Ninth’s decision. [read post]
8 Feb 2008, 3:50 pm
The issue was actively litigated in a celebrated case involving a Maryland law, challenged by Wal-Mart Stores; that case ended without reaching the Supreme Court. [read post]
6 Jul 2011, 8:14 am
ACSblog has two posts on Wal-Mart v. [read post]
29 May 2015, 2:24 pm
The judge who was assigned this case, which challenges Maryland’s reapportionment, decided that a three-judge panel was not required because the complaint failed to state a claim under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6). [read post]
8 Jun 2015, 9:24 am
United States), and will clarify the standard for summoning a special three-judge U.S. [read post]
11 Jan 2012, 6:31 am
Andrew Longstreth of Reuters (via the Chicago Tribune) writes that last Term’s Wal-Mart v. [read post]
