Search for: "Frank v. Bush, et al"
Results 1 - 11
of 11
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Aug 2007, 2:55 pm
Scientific-Atlanta, et al. (06-43), due to be heard by the Court on Oct. 9. [read post]
4 Jun 2012, 7:53 pm
BriscoeDocket: 11-1024Issue(s): Whether a lower court may disregard this Court’s express guidance and create Title VII disparate-impact liability for actions this Court ordered an employer to undertake as a remedy for a Title VII disparate-treatment violation.Certiorari stage documents:Opinion below (2d Cir.)Petition for certiorari Brief in oppositionAmicus brief of Cato InstituteAmicus brief of National League of Cities et al.Amicus brief of Pacific Legal Foundation et… [read post]
1 Dec 2006, 10:57 am
Freedom from Religion Foundation, et al. (06-157, petition here) -- puts before the Justices for the first time the Bush Administration's controversial policy of extending financial aid to "faith-based" groups. [read post]
13 Jun 2022, 11:37 am
Al., 275). [read post]
2 Dec 2010, 9:16 am
[et al.] ; edited by Junwei Fu, Jacob S. [read post]
11 Feb 2008, 12:53 am
02/08/2008
Appellate Ruling in State of New Jersey v. [read post]
21 Mar 2008, 4:10 pm
Tell that to Damien Hurst, Britart et al.. not to mention some of the great forgers... who do know how to paint… I started painting when I was at school. [read post]
25 Oct 2008, 12:18 am
Swisa: implications for India (Spicy IP) Centre for Science and Environment accused of copyright infringement by Mint's editor (Spicy IP) Delhi High Court dicta on fair dealing increases woes of news channels: ESPN Stars Sports v. [read post]
7 Jun 2023, 8:30 am
Bush Administration issuing prompt letters and Circular A-4; and the Obama administration emphasizing dignity and retrospective review. [read post]
30 Nov 2011, 2:15 pm
Okay, so here’s the next installment of Mandelman’s Monthly Museletter, which I’ve decided I post whenever there are a bunch of things going on that need to be put into proper perspective, but there’s just no way I can write individual articles on each because to do so presents a serious health risk. [read post]
12 Apr 2010, 10:44 am
Click Here American Trucking Association et al. v. [read post]
