Search for: "Frank v. Superior Court"
Results 41 - 60
of 367
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
31 Oct 2022, 7:20 pm
When that motion was denied Mom appealed and the Superior Court quashed the appeal as interlocutory. (750 WDA 2021). [read post]
30 Oct 2022, 10:01 am
The case raises an interesting question of “respondeat superior” for the negligent acts by employees in the course of employment. [read post]
15 Sep 2022, 1:24 pm
Cheng claims that his proposed Consensus Rule is epistemically superior to Rule 702 gatekeeping. [read post]
7 Sep 2022, 6:30 am
The Electoral College may have dubious democratic credentials, but that means for determining the chief executive may be superior to allowing incumbent political parties to change the rules whenever doing so will provide political advantage. [read post]
21 Aug 2022, 9:10 am
To be frank, I wish the MQD could be justified. [read post]
8 Aug 2022, 7:40 am
Because the district court declined to instruct the jury as to retaliatory intent, the appeals court vacated the verdict in favor of the whistleblower and remanded for a new trial (Murray v. [read post]
25 Apr 2022, 9:01 am
Superior Court, 457 U.S. 596, 606 (1982); Volokh is included in both those categories. [read post]
19 Apr 2022, 4:00 am
The first 9 paragraphs feel more like the first lines of a courtroom drama than the first lines of a decision by the Ontario Superior Court of Justice. [read post]
13 Mar 2022, 5:31 pm
Rodriguez, et al. v. [read post]
10 Mar 2022, 8:01 am
[But e]ven if we were to apply heightened scrutiny pursuant to Frank v. [read post]
23 Feb 2022, 5:01 am
Based on this, Plaintiff requests that the Court enter the Los Angeles Superior Court's Model Protective Order without modification…. [read post]
22 Feb 2022, 6:47 am
From Gogol v. [read post]
6 Feb 2022, 1:30 pm
On February 15, 2012, the plaintiff filed suit against the defendants in the Superior Court of California, county of Los Angeles, claiming, inter alia, breach of contract and conversion. [read post]
20 Jan 2022, 12:04 pm
Circuit action has taken place in the case of Trump v. [read post]
19 Jan 2022, 9:38 am
From McClendon v. [read post]
20 Nov 2021, 11:34 am
And to quote the general rationale for this position, from Judge Frank Easterbrook writing in Stevens v. [read post]
19 Nov 2021, 8:21 am
This joint notice procedure was prescribed by the Supreme Judicial Court in Pettingell v. [read post]
14 Nov 2021, 3:13 pm
Rodriguez et al. v. [read post]
4 Nov 2021, 5:37 am
"[11] "The Court is a public institution and the public has a right to look over our shoulders and see who is seeking relief in public court. [read post]
8 Oct 2021, 5:00 am
In the case of Franks v. [read post]
