Search for: "Frankel v Cohen"
Results 1 - 20
of 21
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Aug 2023, 5:44 am
Frankel, P.C., 150 AD3d 1168, 1168; Montero v Cohen, 104 AD3d 654, 655). [read post]
28 Mar 2011, 2:10 am
Sarah Stackpole, M.D. v Cohen, Ehrlich & Frankel, LLP ; 2011 NY Slip Op 02137 ; Decided on March 24, 2011 ; Appellate Division, First Department illustrates the "but for" element of legal malpractice. [read post]
29 Jan 2014, 8:05 pm
“Bloggers = Media for First Amendment Libel Law Purposes” [Obsidian Finance Corp. v. [read post]
20 Aug 2012, 6:20 am
In his column for The Nation, Herman Schwartz criticizes the Court’s recent decision in Florence v. [read post]
14 Apr 2009, 4:42 am
In Stackpole v. [read post]
26 Mar 2024, 11:15 am
In S.I. v. [read post]
22 Oct 2019, 4:35 am
Mah v 40-44 W. 120th St. [read post]
20 Aug 2010, 11:48 am
As the First Department noted in Collier, Cohen, Crystal & Bock v. [read post]
20 Feb 2018, 3:55 am
Cohen, Ehrlich & Frankel, LLP, 82 AD3d at 610. [read post]
24 May 2018, 3:55 am
(Nomura Asset Capital Corp. v Cadwalader, Wickersham & Taft LLP, 26 NY3d at 50; LaRusso v Katz, 30 AD3d 240, 243 [1st Dept 2006]; Brooks v Lewin, 21 AD3d 731, 734 [1st Dept 2005]; see Stackpole v Cohen, Ehrlich & Frankel, LLP, 82 AD3d 609, 610 [1st Dept 2011].) [read post]
25 Apr 2008, 1:29 am
Apr 24, 2008) (NO. 9478, 401620/04)Kramer Levin Naftalis & Frankel LLP, New York (Gary P. [read post]
20 Jan 2012, 7:02 am
In Maples v. [read post]
27 Jul 2008, 3:27 pm
In Wilkes v. [read post]
8 Jun 2016, 6:15 am
District Judge Marvin Frankel dismissed that complaint. [read post]
16 Apr 2012, 6:01 am
Shack and Jacques v. [read post]
27 Dec 2018, 9:01 pm
” As noted above, the Seventh Circuit in Judge v. [read post]
18 Jan 2012, 3:57 am
§ 1920 (PDF) t.co/f6HHAi9a (Latham & Watkins) No Resolution Reached in Pippins v. [read post]
2 May 2012, 5:52 am
Georgetown Law Rolls Out the ‘Law Firm Pronunciation Guide - bit.ly/KoaqON (Bruce Carton) Global Aerospace Inc. v. [read post]
28 Mar 2012, 4:53 am
Bank N.A. v. [read post]
8 Aug 2012, 5:29 am
Samsung: Lack of Custodian Follow-Up+Failure to Suspend Auto-Deletion of Email=Adverse Inference - http://bit.ly/MaaYhA (@LegalHoldPro) Who's Tweeting live from the Apple v Samsung trial? [read post]
