Search for: "Frankel v. United States"
Results 41 - 60
of 116
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Sep 2016, 4:43 am
” At Reuters, Alison Frankel suggests that next term’s Salman v. [read post]
10 Jun 2016, 5:42 am
As I explain in the post, within hours after Ali refused to step forward for military induction, the New York State Athletic Commission withdrew his license to fight on the ground that licensing a man who refused induction was “detrimental to the best interests of boxing”; and, within days, every important state boxing commission in the nation had followed suit, thereby effectively preventing Ali from fighting in the United States. [read post]
8 Jun 2016, 6:15 am
Within days, every important state boxing commission in the nation had followed suit, effectively preventing Ali from fighting in the United States. [read post]
25 Jan 2016, 9:39 pm
After the Supreme Court issued its decision last week in Campbell-Ewald Co. v. [read post]
4 Jan 2016, 4:08 pm
Other states may choose to take a different approach. [read post]
8 Sep 2015, 5:08 pm
First, in a July 8, 2015 decision in Acevedo v. [read post]
17 Aug 2015, 5:03 am
This time round it's patent attorney Suleman Ali (Holly IP), who has been taking another look at life in the United States in the wake of that great nation's Guidance on Eligibility. [read post]
7 Jul 2015, 4:09 pm
Judgment The judgment of the Court was given by Groberman J, with whom Frankel and Harris JJ agreed. [read post]
9 Jul 2014, 4:37 pm
AU Optronics, segments of which have been discussed by Alison Frankel and Jacob Gershman. [read post]
4 Jun 2014, 5:25 am
” In two op-eds for Reuters (here and here), Alison Frankel discusses a recent filing by the government of Argentina in Republic of Argentina v. [read post]
22 May 2014, 2:39 pm
Many readers will be aware that the United States has no generalized protection for moral rights in its copyright law – and, arguably, after the Dastar case, no strong alternative doctrine for the protection of an author’s right to attribution and the integrity of his or her work, either. [read post]
3 Feb 2014, 4:12 am
United States, the Supreme Court said that proof of reliance is not necessary to support a claim based on alleged omissions. [read post]
6 Jan 2014, 11:20 pm
Supreme Court’s 1988 decision in Basic, Inc. v. [read post]
2 Dec 2013, 1:16 am
United States (here), the Supreme Court recognized a presumption of reliance on an omission of material fact by a party with a duty to disclosure that information. [read post]
26 Nov 2013, 3:14 pm
” Afro-American Publ’g Co. v. [read post]
18 Nov 2013, 12:26 am
In a development that has the potential to change the way private securities suits in the United States are litigated, the U.S. [read post]
11 Nov 2013, 1:10 pm
United States, 404 F.3d 744, 750 (3d Cir. 2005), and dismissal is appropriate only if, accepting all of the facts alleged in the complaint as true, the plaintiff has failed to plead “enough facts to state a claim to relief that is plausible on its face,” Bell Atlantic Corp. v. [read post]
21 Oct 2013, 1:43 pm
– 5:05 P.M.SESSION V (with coffee break 3:30-3:50)NYS CLE Credit: 2.0, Areas of Professional PracticeCommentators on proposals presented, and Q&A PeriodJane Ginsburg, ModeratorMorton L. [read post]
17 Oct 2013, 1:35 am
Chamber of Commerce of the United States and the National Association of Manufacturers filed an amicus brief in support of the company’s petition. [read post]
5 Sep 2013, 4:42 am
California and United States v. [read post]
