Search for: "Frankel v. United States" Results 61 - 80 of 116
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 May 2013, 6:52 am
  If the shirts had been sold in the United States, Rihanna would have a strong claim of violation of her right of publicity. [read post]
3 Apr 2013, 7:07 pm
The Court was asked to review Ninestar Technology Co. v United States International Trade Commission, to determine whether the first sale doctrine would apply to products protected by patents similarly to the way in which Kirtsaeng applied it to copyright products. [read post]
3 Apr 2013, 11:45 am by Conor McEvily
Perry (challenging California’s Proposition 8) and United States v. [read post]
11 Mar 2013, 11:24 am
  Travelling around in cyberspace, and covering as much ground as Kingsley, is Katfriend Miri Frankel who, having only just penned a guest post for PatLit on the SHIELD anti-troll draft bill in the United States, popped up in quite a different area of IP with "Sherlock Holmes and the Case of the Copyright Expiration Date", here. [read post]
31 Jan 2013, 6:24 am by Cormac Early
Perry, the challenge to California’s Proposition 8, while Scottie Thomaston of Equality on Trial covers the National Organization for Marriage’s brief in United States v. [read post]
18 Jan 2013, 7:17 am by Rachel Sachs
Perry (involving Proposition 8) and United States v. [read post]
11 Jan 2013, 6:02 am by Rachel Sachs
At Buzzfeed, Chris Geidner profiles Edith Windsor, the plaintiff in this Term’s United States v. [read post]
7 Jan 2013, 6:21 am by Marissa Miller
Baby Girl, United States v. [read post]
3 Aug 2012, 6:25 am by Rachel Sachs
ProPublica explores states’ varied responses to the Court’s consolidated opinion in Miller v. [read post]
18 Jul 2012, 5:57 am by Rob Robinson
 http://bit.ly/LPLQcg (Bob Ambrogi) Model Behavior: Federal and State Court Rules on eDiscovery - - http://bit.ly/Mk6eHa (Jessica Mederson) Phase 2 of Discovery Pilot Provides Glimpse into Future of eDiscovery – - http://bit.ly/Oxc1V6 (BLLAWG) Robots Are Not Replacing eDiscovery Lawyers - http://bit.ly/MkKifa (Jason Krause) Rules for eDiscovery Vendors in D.C.: Taking A Step Back - http://bit.ly/Lt2hP4 (Cynthia Courtney)… [read post]
12 Jul 2012, 7:26 am by Cormac Early
In the aftermath of United States v. [read post]
5 Jul 2012, 8:53 am by Cormac Early
Briefly: Stanley Fish has a column on United States v. [read post]
28 Jun 2012, 11:55 am by Mali Friedman
By Mali Friedman and Simon Frankel With all eyes on the Affordable Care Act today, the United States Supreme Court also quietly dismissed a case that could have had a profound impact on a wide range of citizens’ rights litigation—First American Financial Corp. v. [read post]
25 Jun 2012, 10:39 am by Geoffrey Rapp
Shaft, Implementing the settlement of State of North Dakota v. [read post]
15 Jun 2012, 6:57 am by Nabiha Syed
 Lyle covered the filing that night for this blog; other coverage comes from Alison Frankel of Reuters, who describes the government’s brief – which was not signed by the Department of State – as “tepidly” argued, and JURIST. [read post]
13 Jun 2012, 1:20 am by Kevin LaCroix
Supreme Court's decision in Morrison v. [read post]