Search for: "Franklin Collection Service, Inc" Results 41 - 60 of 127
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
31 Mar 2016, 5:30 am by Kori Shafer-Stack
The investigation found that Walker did return to work at Mark’s Handyman Service, while concurrently collecting the benefits for a period of five years. [read post]
10 Dec 2015, 10:45 am by John Elwood
Kent Recycling Services, LLC v. [read post]
3 Dec 2015, 12:25 pm by John Elwood
Badr, 14-1440, (which was also rescheduled once) and Universal Health Services, Inc. v. [read post]
26 Aug 2015, 2:15 pm by Robert B. Milligan and Amy Abeloff
  Foreign economic collection and industrial espionage against the United States represent significant and growing threats to the nation’s prosperity and security. [read post]
1 Dec 2014, 6:40 am
("SES"), as landlord, entered into a lease agreement with Coughlin Services, Inc. [read post]
25 Sep 2014, 4:31 pm by Patricia Salkin
In 2004, respondents Preserve Associates, LLC, Big Tupper, LLC, Tupper Lake Boat Club, LLC and Nancy Hull Godshall, (hereinafter collectively referred to as the “developers”), submitted an application to respondent Adirondack Park Agency (“APA”) for approval of the proposed Adirondack Club and Resort to be located on privately-owned land in the Town of Tupper Lake, Franklin County. [read post]
24 Sep 2014, 5:52 am by Adam Gana
Meyer entered the securities industry in January 2000 as an investment company products and variable contracts representative with Franklin Financial Services, Corp. [read post]
3 Jul 2014, 5:30 am by Kori Shafer-Stack
The investigation found that Merritt returned to work at My Brother’s Keeper, Therapeutic Home for Youth, Inc. in Cincinnati as a caretaker while collecting temporary total disability from a work related injury. [read post]
15 Apr 2014, 2:34 pm by Lorene Park
Applying this test in a suit brought by drivers for a restaurant food delivery service, the court granted conditional certification of an FLSA collective action over minimum wage violations because the drivers adequately alleged that a franchise operation formed a joint enterprise under the Act. [read post]