Search for: "Franklin v. Howard" Results 1 - 20 of 68
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Dec 2021, 2:26 pm
As explained in the case for which it is named, People v. [read post]
18 Jul 2022, 4:05 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
The Supreme Court’s determination that Howard Fensterman’s conduct during the settlement of the New Franklin litigation “was simply a product of his conflict of interest in representing both buyers and sellers in the New Franklin and Fort Tyron transactions” is a premature factual finding inappropriate at this stage of the litigation (see Warney v State of New York, 16 NY3d 428, 436-437 [2011]; Matter of Gerard P. v Paula P.,… [read post]
15 Apr 2022, 3:55 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
The Supreme Court’s determination that Howard Fensterman’s conduct during the settlement of the New Franklin litigation “was simply a product of his conflict of interest in representing both buyers and sellers in the New Franklin and Fort Tyron transactions” is a premature factual finding inappropriate at this stage of the litigation (see Warney v State of New York, 16 NY3d 428, 436-437; Matter of Gerard P. v Paula P., 186… [read post]
23 Apr 2008, 4:02 am
Miller, won for co-defendants in State v. [read post]
24 Mar 2016, 9:13 am by Andrew Hamm
Minnesota, Birchfield v. [read post]
20 Jul 2022, 3:06 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
The Supreme Court should have denied that branch of the defendants’ motion which sought dismissal of the fourth cause of action, to recover damages for legal malpractice against the law firm, Howard Fensterman, and Lichtenstein based upon their representation of the plaintiffs in the New Franklin litigation. [read post]
16 Sep 2008, 8:04 pm
Jon Goodrich contributed the following preview of the upcoming term’s Carcieri v. [read post]