Search for: "Franklin v. United States" Results 201 - 220 of 830
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 May 2019, 7:08 am by Jack Goldsmith
” It also notes that the Department of Justice “has relied on this clear-statement principle to interpret certain statutes as not applying to the President at all, similar to the approach taken in Franklin. [read post]
14 May 2019, 4:47 am by Andrew Kent
And third, as Daniel Hemel and Eric Posner have pointed out, the Supreme Court did not apply a clear statement in United States v. [read post]
12 May 2019, 1:01 pm by Benjamin Wittes
As Goldsmith aptly summarizes the Supreme Court jurisprudence: The leading Supreme Court decision on the presidential clear statement rule is Franklin v. [read post]
11 May 2019, 7:18 am by Jack Goldsmith
The Clear Statement Rule The leading Supreme Court decision on the presidential clear statement rule is Franklin v. [read post]
5 Apr 2019, 9:30 pm by Dan Ernst
And, in other news from the FJC, check out the most recent addition to the Center's unit to our Famous Federal Trials series, U.S. v. [read post]
5 Apr 2019, 7:53 am by Scott Bomboy
Representative Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez said in a TV interview with MSNBC, “They had to amend the Constitution of the United States to make sure [Franklin] Roosevelt did not get reelected,” referring to the 22nd Amendment. [read post]
4 Apr 2019, 6:00 am by Guest Blogger
  If the Supreme Court is an elite largely influenced by elites, the United States is not a democracy in the classical Aristotelean sense, but a mixed regime where aristocrats and plebes both participate in governance. [read post]
19 Mar 2019, 7:24 am by Katherine Kelley
Like the original Brookings report, I collected data on sextortion occurring both within and outside of the United States. [read post]
19 Mar 2019, 5:30 am by Kevin
 See “United States v. 1855.6 Pounds of American Paddlefish Meat” (Nov. 14, 2018) and “Update: The Paddlefish Defendants Are Now for Sale” (Jan. 28, 2019). [read post]
12 Mar 2019, 4:00 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
From 2006 through 2018, plaintiffs honored the forbearance agreements while WOH “guided the project through . . . the APA permit, Town of Tupper Lake rezoning and subdivision approvals, New York State Department of Environmental Conservation permits, United States Army Corps of Engineers permits, and New York State Attorney General approvals” (Henry Aff., ¶ 5). [read post]