Search for: "Franks v. Collins" Results 81 - 100 of 128
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Jun 2022, 11:37 am by Jennifer Davis
KF7224.5 .C64 1985 Collins, Donald E. [read post]
19 Jan 2017, 9:30 pm by Justin Daniel
Supreme Court heard oral arguments in the case of Lee v. [read post]
15 Mar 2010, 3:53 pm
UnitedHealth Group, Inc (Mallesons Stephen Jaques)   US Copyright – Decisions CAFC: The transformative nature of a photograph: Copyright and the Korean War Veterans Memorial: Frank Gaylord v United States (IP Osgoode) 4th Circuit: Fine art paintings from photographs and actual damages for copyright infringement: Hofmann v. [read post]
15 Mar 2010, 3:53 pm
UnitedHealth Group, Inc (Mallesons Stephen Jaques)   US Copyright – Decisions CAFC: The transformative nature of a photograph: Copyright and the Korean War Veterans Memorial: Frank Gaylord v United States (IP Osgoode) 4th Circuit: Fine art paintings from photographs and actual damages for copyright infringement: Hofmann v. [read post]
22 Jan 2024, 1:10 am by INFORRM
Research and Resources LoMonte, Frank and Leibert, Stephanie, Internet Famous: Are Online Influencers and Micro-Celebrities Public Figures Under Defamation Law? [read post]
9 Jul 2021, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
CFPB and, just this term, Collins v. [read post]
3 Sep 2023, 4:43 pm by INFORRM
IPSO Satisfactory Remedy – 18621-23 Booley v ok.co.uk, 1 Accuracy (2021), Resolved – satisfactory remedy 18524-23 Barnwell v The Times, 1 Accuracy (2021), No breach – after investigation 18355-23 A complainant v nationalworld.com, 14 Confidential sources (2021), No breach – after investigation Satisfactory Remedy – 17293-23 Reynolds v swindonadvertiser.co.uk, 1 Accuracy (2021), Resolved – satisfactory remedy 18392-23 Marshall De… [read post]
30 Oct 2022, 12:54 am by Frank Cranmer
Charles Collins, Crux: The Seal of Confession could be latest casualty of sex abuse crisis. [read post]
22 Jun 2022, 12:37 am by Frank Cranmer
In DPP v Collins [2006] UKHL 40, Lord Bingham said at [9] that “There can be no yardstick of gross offensiveness otherwise than by the application of reasonably enlightened, but not perfectionist, contemporary standards to the particular message sent in its particular context. [read post]
30 Aug 2012, 9:22 am
http://www.bankruptcylitigationblog.com/uploads/file/CASTLETON-BK-SD-IN-LORCH-9-30-11.pdf … B-SDNY: Absent exigent circumstances, stay imposed per Ch 15 is coterminous w/stay in corresponding foreign proceeding. http://www.bankruptcylitigationblog.com/uploads/file/DAEWOO-BK-SD-NY-LIFLAND-10-5-11.pdf … B-IA dismisses §548(a)(1)(B) cplt under Twiqbal based on failure to adequate plead insolvency, even if FRCP 9 inapplic.… [read post]
4 Mar 2010, 8:49 pm by Ronald K.L. Collins
When value-driven philosophers, reformers, or jurists venture to set limits on free speech, as Anthony Comstock did in Traps for the Young (1883) or as Justice Frank Murphy did in Chaplinsky v. [read post]
3 Dec 2023, 12:06 am by Frank Cranmer
Wearing religious symbols and the CJEU To the surprise of some (though not to us because we’d read the earlier Opinion of Advocate General Collins) on Tuesday, in OP v Commune d’Ans [2023] EUECJ C‑148/22 the CJEU held that the ban on municipal employees wearing signs or dress indicating their religious or philosophical beliefs imposed by the Commune d’Ans, in Belgium, was not incompatible with their rights under the EU Charter: we noted the case… [read post]
13 Sep 2018, 10:00 pm by Jim Sedor
She has said she would not vote to confirm a nominee who was hostile to Roe v. [read post]
29 Apr 2010, 2:08 pm by Jim Hodgson
Collins, a partner at the law firm of Mayer Brown, and a former Refco legal adviser, has been convicted in a federal court of conspiracy to commit securities fraud and four other counts of illegal actions and is serving a seven year prison sentence. [read post]
13 Mar 2016, 5:05 pm by INFORRM
Northern Ireland Businessman Frank Cushnahan is launching defamation proceedings against the BBC and others. [read post]
15 May 2016, 4:20 pm by INFORRM
On 10 May 2016, HHJ Moloney QC heard applications in the cases of Ghuman v Ghuman and Hussain v Feeney. [read post]