Search for: "Franks v. Social Security Administration"
Results 41 - 60
of 134
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Nov 2018, 11:56 am
Michael O’Hanlon will serve as moderator, and Frank A. [read post]
4 Jan 2014, 7:00 am
Department of Homeland Security. [read post]
2 Dec 2012, 7:52 pm
Jindal Global University; Formerly Professor and Dean, Faculty of Law, University of Delhi, India Enforcing Socio-Economic Rights through Public Interest Litigation: An Overview of the Indian Experience 3) Dr Leïla Choukroune, Senior Lecturer in International Economic Law, Faculty of Law, Maastricht University, The Netherlands The Paradox of Justiciability: Labour PIL in China and India Questions/Comments 6:30pm-8:30pm – Welcome Dinner hosted by the City University Law School (by… [read post]
19 Dec 2011, 3:11 am
Law » Social aspects. [read post]
3 Jan 2018, 6:18 pm
This post includes current reporting on the visit by Marc Frank for Reuters and an analysis of the PDCA. [read post]
27 Apr 2021, 7:30 am
Locke and James v. [read post]
12 Oct 2016, 12:47 pm
Only three independent agencies, it states, seem to be governed by one person who cannot be removed for cause: “the Social Security Administration, the Office of Special Counsel, and the Federal Housing Finance Agency. [read post]
12 Oct 2016, 12:12 pm
Yesterday, in PHH Corporation v. [read post]
2 Mar 2017, 9:30 pm
Environmental Protection Agency—and foreign aid, but which is expected to leave Social Security and Medicare funded at steady levels. [read post]
30 Jun 2019, 8:24 pm
Nations are themselves a socially constructed community, imbued with rights, responsibilities and laws. [read post]
7 Jul 2023, 1:03 pm
Atlantic Council’s DFRLab, #StopTheSteal: Timeline of Social Media and Extremist Activities Leading to 1/6 Insurrection, Just Security (Feb. 10, 2021) 2. [read post]
11 Feb 2013, 9:01 pm
Wade, taking on Griswold v. [read post]
28 Jun 2011, 1:26 pm
Nevertheless, same-sex couples in New York who marry will not be married under federal law -- a confusing situation when it comes to immigration, taxes, and federal benefits such as Social Security. [read post]
16 Nov 2011, 7:09 am
Citizens - http://bit.ly/vkPXsF (Gibbons) Watchdog (SEC) v. [read post]
24 Jan 2019, 2:36 pm
For instance, in SEC v. [read post]
28 Jan 2019, 2:26 pm
Anderson, a Q&A moderated by Brookings Senior Fellow Frank Rose, and a panel discussion led by Michael O’Hanlon of the Brookings Foreign Policy Program. [read post]
7 May 2019, 11:56 am
Last year, the California Supreme Court decided Dynamex Operations West, Inc. v. [read post]
23 May 2012, 3:07 pm
A primary drafter of the Bolivian Social Security pension privatization law, Ms. [read post]
7 Mar 2022, 9:18 am
Beyer’s article Estate Planning Ramifications of Obergefell v. [read post]
22 Jan 2021, 6:00 am
These intellectuals treat marriage equality for LGBTQ+ persons as an admirable social movement and Obergefell v. [read post]
