Search for: "Franks v. State" Results 261 - 280 of 4,659
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Dec 2022, 6:03 am by Unknown
Title V of Division AA of the FY23 appropriations bill would provide for a registration exemption for small business mergers and acquisitions brokers by amending Exchange Act Section 15(b) to add a new subsection (13). [read post]
20 Dec 2022, 3:02 am by Frank Cranmer
Background In Tonchev and Others v Bulgaria [2022] ECHR 1072 [in French], the applicants were ministers of  Evangelical Churches in Burgas and Evangelical religious associations based in Burgas. [read post]
9 Dec 2022, 6:00 am by Guest Blogger
  This process of judicial nullification culminated in Plessy v. [read post]
6 Dec 2022, 3:45 am by Kyle Hulehan
Both states saw major increases in cigarette smuggling. [read post]
3 Dec 2022, 4:27 pm by Eugene Volokh
From Judge Frank Easterbrook's opinion Monday in Doe v. [read post]
2 Dec 2022, 1:12 am by Frank Cranmer
In Ilyin and Others v Ukraine [2022] ECHR 1005, the authorities had refused to register a community of the Unification Church based in Kyiv. [read post]
30 Nov 2022, 5:00 am by jonathanturley
She was fired because she exercised free speech in an internal meeting on the Supreme Court’s decision in Dobbs v. [read post]
28 Nov 2022, 9:47 am by Andria So
Local actors seek climate change damages from the biggest fossil fuel companies through state law litigation In the wake of West Virginia v. [read post]
27 Nov 2022, 9:01 pm by Austin Sarat
The first trial ended in a mistrial when jurors could not agree on whether he should be convicted of second-degree or first-degree murder.In advance of that trial, the prosecutors developed a strategy to get around the requirements of the United States Supreme Court’s 1986 Batson v Kentucky decision. [read post]
23 Nov 2022, 2:50 am by Emma Kent
Disposal of assets Impact on award In M v M (Financial Misconduct: Subpoena against Third Party) [2006], in breach of undertakings, which are solemn promises to the court, the husband failed to provide full and frank disclosure of his financial affairs and had also gambled away a significant amount of money. [read post]