Search for: "Freeman's Estate, Matter of"
Results 21 - 40
of 123
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Dec 2021, 1:45 pm
Professor David Freeman EngstromThe access-to-justice crisis is deep and socially costly. [read post]
25 May 2012, 6:39 am
Yesterday the Court released two opinions, in Freeman v. [read post]
22 Feb 2012, 8:52 am
And matters got worse for Freeman when O’Connell suggested that the Court need not worry about liability of consumers because HUD could protect them as a matter of prosecutorial discretion. [read post]
27 Aug 2014, 7:04 pm
In discharging this duty to review fees, the court cannot apply a selected few factors which might be more favorable to one position or another but must strike a balance by considering all of the elements set forth in Matter of Potts, and as re-enunciated in Matter of Freeman. [read post]
9 Jul 2014, 7:05 pm
In discharging this duty to review fees, the court cannot apply a selected few factors which might be more favorable to one position or another but must strike a balance by considering all of the elements set forth in Matter of Potts, and as re-enunciated in Matter of Freeman. [read post]
23 Jul 2014, 7:04 pm
In discharging this duty to review fees, the court cannot apply a selected few factors which might be more favorable to one position or another but must strike a balance by considering all of the elements set forth in Matter of Potts, and as re-enunciated in Matter of Freeman. [read post]
14 May 2014, 6:34 pm
In discharging this duty to review fees, the court cannot apply a selected few factors which might be more favorable to one position or another but must strike a balance by considering all of the elements set forth in Matter of Potts, and as re-enunciated in Matter of Freeman. [read post]
22 Jan 2016, 5:13 pm
In discharging this duty to review fees, the court cannot apply a selected few factors which might be more favorable to one position or another but must strike a balance by considering all of the elements set forth in Matter of Potts (241 NY 593 [1925]), as re-enunciated in Matter of Freeman (34 NY2d 1 [1974]). [read post]
28 Jun 2013, 11:57 am
Accordingly, a Brooklyn Probate Lawyer said based upon the affirmation and time records submitted by the guardian ad litem, the foregoing and the criteria to be used in fixing attorneys' fees as established by two cases, Matter of Potts in 1924/1925 and Matter of Freeman in 1974, the court fixed the fee of the attorney in the amount as requested and finds a fee of $1,800.00 to be reasonable. [read post]
4 Oct 2012, 3:05 pm
Reading all of the relevant provisions together, the Court concluded that the Probate Act confers only limited standing on the guardian in connection with matters directly related to the ward’s estate. [read post]
12 May 2014, 6:36 pm
Based upon the criteria established by Matter of Freeman and Matter of Potts as applied to guardian’s ad litem, the court awards the guardian ad litem the fee of $9,000.00. [read post]
17 Sep 2013, 7:28 pm
In discharging this duty to review fees, the court cannot apply a selected few factors which might be more favorable to one position or another but must strike a balance by considering all of the elements set forth in Matter of Potts, and as re-enunciated in Matter of Freeman . [read post]
16 Aug 2012, 8:48 am
See Lebitz-Freeman v. [read post]
13 May 2014, 6:35 pm
In discharging this duty to review fees, the court cannot apply a selected few factors which might be more favorable to one position or another but must strike a balance by considering all of the elements set forth in Matter of Potts, and as re-enunciated in Matter of Freeman. [read post]
10 Aug 2010, 9:16 am
Law Lessons from In The Matter of the Estate of Pasquale Suraci, Deceased, BER-P-284-09, Honorable Peter E. [read post]
25 Mar 2016, 8:11 am
As a rule, a settlement may embrace and be binding upon the court only as to those matters that are within the power of the parties to resolve without prior judicial approval. [read post]
10 Jul 2014, 7:06 pm
In discharging this duty to review fees, the court cannot apply a selected few factors which might be more favorable to one position or another but must strike a balance by considering all of the elements set forth in Matter of Potts, and as re-enunciated in Matter of Freeman. [read post]
29 Mar 2013, 9:41 am
Freeman, Practice Group Leader 415.774.2966 (office) gfreeman@sheppardmullin.com Alan H. [read post]
27 May 2012, 10:31 pm
The Court found the “plain language” of the Real Estate Procedures Act of 1974 (“RESPA”) to be controlling in Freeman v. [read post]
24 May 2013, 12:51 pm
Justice Freeman asked counsel how subsections (b) and (c) of the statute should be read together. [read post]
