Search for: "Freeman v. United States"
Results 321 - 340
of 464
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Jul 2011, 9:03 am
United States by Peter Spiro. [read post]
3 Jul 2011, 8:59 am
In the appellate decison of United States v. [read post]
29 Jun 2011, 6:34 am
United States, 10-7515, for United States v. [read post]
28 Jun 2011, 2:56 pm
United States District Courts are Article III courts. [read post]
28 Jun 2011, 2:56 pm
United States District Courts are Article III courts. [read post]
28 Jun 2011, 10:33 am
http://www.courts.wa.gov/opinions/pdf/39870-2.11.doc.pdf Federal Law United States Supreme Court Freeman v. [read post]
27 Jun 2011, 6:30 am
United States, 09-10246 (held since 9/27/10 for Freeman) Smith v. [read post]
24 Jun 2011, 8:04 pm
In Freeman v. [read post]
24 Jun 2011, 3:52 pm
United States. [read post]
24 Jun 2011, 8:43 am
United States. [read post]
24 Jun 2011, 7:26 am
United States, holding that Petitioner William Freeman could move for a sentence reduction because of retroactive amendments to the crack guidelines.In United States v. [read post]
24 Jun 2011, 2:48 am
In United States v. [read post]
23 Jun 2011, 10:43 pm
United States. [read post]
23 Jun 2011, 11:46 am
United States. [read post]
23 Jun 2011, 11:21 am
The case is Freeman v. [read post]
23 Jun 2011, 8:07 am
United States, but this time Justice Kennedy joined the four liberal justices to hold that criminal defendants who enter into plea agreements can benefit from retroactive changes to the sentencing guidelines.In CSX Transportation v. [read post]
23 Jun 2011, 8:03 am
United States, No. 09-10245. [read post]
17 Jun 2011, 9:02 pm
Specifically, this note analyzes three different cases from three different fields of law decided by U.S. courts that illustrate this problem: United States v. [read post]
16 Jun 2011, 12:15 am
Neary and his father London Borough of Hillingdon v. [read post]
