Search for: "Freeze v. State"
Results 61 - 80
of 1,304
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Mar 2016, 10:09 am
United States, No. 14-419. [read post]
23 Sep 2013, 4:00 am
CPLR Article 78 expresses a preference that state courts, rather than federal courts, decide a federal litigant’s “state-law statutory-construction” claim Carver v. [read post]
30 Mar 2023, 2:38 pm
United States) here or below: [read post]
24 Dec 2018, 11:30 am
In Commonwealth v. [read post]
19 Jul 2020, 4:41 pm
This is illustrated by the recent decision of the Supreme Court of British Columbia in Pirani v. [read post]
27 Jan 2016, 3:09 am
On the point of absence of power, Carnwath stated that there was statutory authority provided by the EU Regulation 81, which was given effect by the European Communities Act 1971, to satisfy the principle in Entick v Carrington that interference by the state with individual property rights cannot be justified by the exercise of prerogative powers, unsupported by specific statutory authority. [read post]
7 Aug 2010, 5:54 am
United States v. [read post]
21 Oct 2015, 5:23 am
Briefly: Writing for the blog of the National Conference of State Legislatures, Lisa Soronen discusses the State and Local Legal Center’s amicus brief in Luis v. [read post]
17 Oct 2013, 10:49 am
Photo by Steve Barrett On March 18, 2013, a Petition for Writ of Certiorari was granted in the case of United States v. [read post]
23 Mar 2022, 8:36 am
v=SV_4M9R8Ggs [read post]
12 Jan 2012, 8:12 pm
In my preview of Tuesday’s oral argument at CAAF in United States v. [read post]
20 May 2016, 7:11 am
Sila Luis v. [read post]
6 Apr 2016, 7:10 am
Supreme Court’s ruling last week in Luis v. [read post]
25 Nov 2009, 2:52 pm
And how in the world do you divine that state of mind? [read post]
26 Feb 2014, 4:00 pm
In United States v. [read post]
17 Oct 2013, 9:30 am
The Supreme Court yesterday heard arguments in the case of Kaley v. [read post]
30 Mar 2016, 7:37 am
The case is Luis v. [read post]
31 May 2012, 2:55 am
"Absent fraud, collusion, malicious acts, or other special circumstances, an attorney is not liable to third parties not in privity or near-privity for harm caused by professional negligence" (Fredriksen v Fredriksen, 30 AD3d 370, 372; see AG Capital Funding Partners, L.P. v State St. [read post]
24 May 2018, 8:37 am
Chief Judge Paulette V. [read post]
28 Nov 2022, 12:43 pm
The policy at the heart of United States v. [read post]
