Search for: "Friedman v. District Court" Results 21 - 40 of 786
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Jul 2014, 9:29 am by Friedman, Rodman & Frank, P.A.
The United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida in Tampa has dismissed a lawsuit that was filed against the parent company of an insurer. [read post]
26 Oct 2011, 3:43 pm by Viking
Professor Friedman has posted several amicus filings for Williams v. [read post]
30 Oct 2015, 5:00 am by Daniel E. Cummins
MannionFederal Middle District CourtUltimately, the court ruled that the carrier was not required to obtain a new rejection of stacking issue when the Plaintiff added a vehicle (motorcycle) to the policy. [read post]
13 Jul 2012, 4:34 pm by Nigel Howard
Following up from our prior blog entry on the case of Friedman v. [read post]
11 Aug 2009, 4:18 am
By Robert Milligan and summer associate Alana Friedman A federal district court in Oregon recently granted a motion to stay in a dual-state non-compete matter based on the first-to-file rule, even though the two cases were filed only a few hours apart. [read post]
25 Jul 2014, 9:33 am by Friedman, Rodman & Frank, P.A.
Court, SD Florida 2014 More Blogs: Florida Federal Court Discusses Constructive Notice in Premises Liability Case: Feliciano v. [read post]
28 Mar 2014, 6:40 am by Steve Delchin
Friedman of the Eastern District of Michigan which struck down Michigan’s ban on same-sex marriage. [read post]
1 Apr 2014, 5:51 pm by Steve Delchin
  Even though the Sixth Circuit acted expeditiously (even on a weekend), the gap between the district court ruling and the stay creates uncertainty for a number of people. [read post]
9 Jun 2014, 10:34 am by Friedman, Rodman & Frank, P.A.
Court of Appeals, 1st Dist. 2014 More Blogs: Florida’s Fifth District Court of Appeals Reverses Summary Judgment in Car Accident Case: Hubner v. [read post]
13 Jul 2012, 4:34 pm by Nigel Howard
Following up from our prior blog entry on the case of Friedman v. [read post]
1 Apr 2019, 12:45 pm by Eugene Volokh
Although the Court is not deciding today whether SPP can prevail on this claim, the Court concludes that SPP has included sufficient facts to provide notice to District 211 of a plausible claim under the IRFRA. [read post]
22 Mar 2014, 6:58 am by Timothy P. Flynn
Michigan's first couple with their lawyerUnited States District Court Judge Bernard Friedman, in a historic ruling, not only held that Michigan's ban on same-sex marriages, set forth in our state constitution, violates the U.S. [read post]