Search for: "Friedman v. Dolan" Results 1 - 11 of 11
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Nov 2009, 1:00 pm
" Nevertheless, the Supreme Court has declined to review a lower court decision (pdf download) in Pro Football, Inc. v. [read post]
25 May 2018, 10:26 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
Joseph by the Sea High School, Cardinal Timothy Dolan and the Archdiocese of New York, respondents.Harrison, Harrison & Assoc., Ltd., New York (Julie Salwen of counsel), for amicus curiae.Judges: Friedman, J.P., Gische, Andrias, Kern, Oing, JJ.Opinion Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Erika M. [read post]
1 Mar 2024, 6:12 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
The doctrine of res judicata applies to preclude plaintiff’s claims asserted in the third action, as those claims arise out of the same transaction or series of transactions that were brought to a final conclusion in the first action by plaintiff against, among others, defendant Allan Houston (Rondeau v Houston, 2013 NY Slip Op 33363[U] [Sup Ct, NY County 2013], affd 118 AD3d 638 [1st Dept 2014], lv dismissed 24 NY3d 999 [2015]; see In re Hunter, 4 NY3d 260,… [read post]
18 Nov 2011, 7:35 am by Marissa Miller
In an op-ed for the New York Times, Reynolds Holding and Robert Cole describe Mayo Collaborative Services v. [read post]
2 Mar 2010, 2:10 pm by Anna Christensen
  Links to the petitioners’ briefs have been added to the case pages for Dolan v. [read post]
27 Jan 2014, 3:35 am by Peter Mahler
I’ll be on the panel along with Associate Justice David Friedman of the New York Supreme Court Appellate Division, First Department; Vice Chancellor Travis Laster of the Delaware Court of Chancery; Delaware attorney Kurt Heyman of Proctor Heyman LLP; and New York attorney Jeffrey Eilender of Schlam Stone & Dolan LLP. [read post]
17 May 2020, 4:39 pm by INFORRM
Simon Dolan said he received an unsatisfactory response to his challenge over the legality of the lockdown in a “letter before action” sent two weeks ago and his lawyers intend to go to the high court to seek permission for an urgent judicial review of the background to the lockdown imposed on 23 March. [read post]