Search for: "Friends of Juana Briones House v. Palo Alto" Results 1 - 13 of 13
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
31 Aug 2012, 10:22 am by Arthur F. Coon
Napa County Board of Supervisors (2012) 205 Cal.App.4th 162 (holding Napa County’s revised lot line adjustment ordinance properly classified lot line adjustment decisions consistent with the Map Act’s exemption as ministerial in nature and exempt from CEQA); Friends of Juana Briones House v. [read post]
24 Apr 2017, 2:32 pm by Arthur F. Coon
” The Court noted “[a]n important elaboration” of ministerial/discretionary analysis is the “functional test” announced in Friends of Westwood, Inc. v. [read post]
30 Jul 2018, 10:24 am by Arthur F. Coon
  In concluding they do not, it observed that the issuance of building permits is presumed ministerial absent any discretionary provision in the governing ordinance (CEQA Guidelines, § 15268(b); Friends of Juana Briones House v. [read post]
8 Nov 2012, 9:51 am by Arthur F. Coon
Napa County Bd. of Supervisors (1st Dist. 2012) 205 Cal.App.4th 162, 178-179 (“‘The statutory distinction between discretionary and purely ministerial projects implicitly recognizes that unless a public agency can shape the project in a way that would respond to concerns raised in an [EIR] … environmental review would be a meaningless exercise.’”);  Friends of Juana Briones House v. [read post]
31 Aug 2012, 10:22 am by Arthur F. Coon
Napa County Board of Supervisors (2012) 205 Cal.App.4th 162 (holding Napa County’s revised lot line adjustment ordinance properly classified lot line adjustment decisions consistent with the Map Act’s exemption as ministerial in nature and exempt from CEQA); Friends of Juana Briones House v. [read post]
The updated Guidelines will also help streamline the development process for housing projects in low-VMT and transit-oriented locations, thereby helping increase the supply of housing options in areas with low transportation costs. [read post]