Search for: "Friends of Westwood, Inc. v. City of Los Angeles (1987)"
Results 1 - 9
of 9
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Nov 2012, 9:51 am
In a long footnote, the Court noted Walmart’s counsel had cited and quoted key language from a seminal CEQA case — Friends of Westwood, Inc. v. [read post]
8 Nov 2012, 9:51 am
” In a long footnote, the Court noted Walmart’s counsel had cited and quoted key language from a seminal CEQA case — Friends of Westwood, Inc. v. [read post]
24 Apr 2017, 2:32 pm
City of Los Angeles (1987) 191 Cal.App.3d 259, which focuses on whether an agency has discretion to require project changes that would mitigate environmental consequences an EIR might reveal. [read post]
10 Jul 2017, 4:04 pm
City of Los Angeles, 191 Cal.App.3d 259 (1987), these provisions did not confer the ability to mitigate environmental impacts in a meaningful way. [read post]
28 Aug 2020, 12:25 pm
City of Los Angeles (1987) 191 Cal.App.3d 259, 267; Mountain Lion Foundation v. [read post]
7 Jan 2019, 10:29 am
The new VMT methodology will not be mandatory until July 1, 2020, unless implemented early by a lead agency, as has been done by the City of San Francisco. [read post]
3 Jan 2018, 5:28 pm
City of Los Angeles, 191 Cal.App.3d 259 (1987), these provisions did not confer the ability to mitigate environmental impacts in a meaningful way. [read post]
11 Oct 2017, 1:01 am
City of Los Angeles, 191 Cal.App.3d 259 (1987), these provisions did not confer the ability to mitigate environmental impacts in a meaningful way. [read post]
11 Oct 2017, 1:01 am
City of Los Angeles, 191 Cal.App.3d 259 (1987), these provisions did not confer the ability to mitigate environmental impacts in a meaningful way. [read post]
