Search for: "Fritz v. Fritz" Results 21 - 40 of 428
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Jun 2023, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
This is one of the challenging tasks that Fritz takes on in this work. [read post]
19 Jun 2023, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
It was famously rejected in McCulloch v. [read post]
16 Jun 2023, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
  Professor Fritz’s book raises an unavoidable question about word usage. [read post]
15 Jun 2023, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
United States (1992) and Printz v. [read post]
14 Jun 2023, 6:30 am by Sandy Levinson
Fritz, Monitoring American Federalism: The History of State Legislative Resistance (Cambridge University Press, 2023). [read post]
8 May 2023, 4:59 pm by Jacob Katz Cogan
Evenett, Johannes Fritz, & Tommaso Giardini, Mira Burri, María Vásquez Callo-Müller, & Kholofelo Kugler, and Shin-yi Peng. [read post]
4 Apr 2023, 12:46 am by Anthony Gaughan
Fritz is Emeritus Professor of Law at the University of New Mexico School of Law. [read post]
22 Mar 2023, 2:00 pm by Howard Bashman
Supreme Court has posted online the transcript and audio of today’s oral argument in Jack Daniel’s Properties, Inc. v. [read post]
21 Mar 2023, 7:01 am by Randy E. Barnett
(2021) Donald Drakeman, The Hollow Core of Constitutional Theory: Why We Need the Framers (2021) Jamal Greene, How Rights Went Wrong: Why Our Obsession With Rights is Tearing America Apart (2021) David Schwartz, The Spirit of the Constitution: John Marshall and the 200-Year Odyssey of McCulloch v. [read post]
17 Mar 2023, 7:09 am
Later, a version of interposition termed “Judicial Federalism” emerged as a constraint on federal legislative power in Printz v. [read post]
17 Mar 2023, 7:08 am by Christine Corcos
Later, a version of interposition termed “Judicial Federalism” emerged as a constraint on federal legislative power in Printz v. [read post]
8 Jan 2023, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
” I have no particular brief for high Federalists from New England, but I do wonder what we might think had Garrison actually been influential and several New England states accepted his view and tried to secede, say, after the Supreme Court’s decision in Prigg v. [read post]
30 Dec 2022, 5:31 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Although an attorney representing the executor of an estate, generally, is not liable to the beneficiaries of the estate (see Kramer v Belfi, 106 AD2d 615, 616), as the attorney does not represent the estate itself (see Betz v Blatt, 116 AD3d at 816; Matter of Hof, 102 AD2d 591, 593), when fraud, collusion, malicious acts, or other special circumstances exist, an attorney may be liable to those third parties, even though not in privity with them, for harm caused by… [read post]