Search for: "Fry v. United States"
Results 61 - 80
of 176
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 May 2016, 1:14 pm
(In a brief filed on May 20, the government also recommended that the Court grant review in Fry v. [read post]
24 May 2016, 3:57 am
Fry (traveling with companion); United States v. [read post]
23 May 2016, 8:05 pm
Fry (traveling with companion); United States v. [read post]
23 Feb 2016, 3:17 pm
Correction of judgment and restitution: “There is something very wrong with this picture – so wrong Stevie Wonder could see the flaw from a phone booth in Chicago:” United States v. [read post]
23 Feb 2016, 3:17 pm
’” (slip op. at 6) (citing United States v. [read post]
5 Feb 2016, 12:49 am
Rich v. [read post]
28 Jan 2016, 7:03 am
United States, 730 F.2d 1465, 1468 (Fed. [read post]
20 Jan 2016, 5:55 am
Yesterday the Court announced that it had granted review in United States v. [read post]
19 Jan 2016, 6:50 am
The case of United States v. [read post]
13 Jan 2016, 4:23 pm
The United States Supreme Court found Florida's death penalty statute unconstitutional in Hurst v. [read post]
8 Jan 2016, 8:00 pm
United States v. [read post]
24 Nov 2015, 3:02 pm
” Khamenei also accused the United States of trying to divide Iraq along sectarian lines and urged Iraqis to oppose any such U.S. efforts. [read post]
31 Oct 2015, 8:14 am
On Thursday, the Supreme Court of the United States denied a stay to Florida murderer Jerry Correll, who was an exemplar of why anything less than death is inadequate for some killers. [read post]
6 Mar 2015, 12:53 pm
The Fredericksburg Care Company LP v. [read post]
27 Feb 2015, 1:00 pm
United States, the Supreme Court interpreted a law passed in the wake of the collapse of Enron as result of massive white collar fraud. [read post]
10 Dec 2014, 4:54 am
In Weeks v. [read post]
6 Jul 2014, 3:16 pm
United States. [read post]
23 May 2014, 11:37 am
It was Arzú who had just persuaded the United Nations to take Guatemala off its blacklist. [read post]
2 May 2014, 12:28 pm
United States, 13-7451 (involving whether Sarbanes-Oxley’s “anti-shredding” prohibition can be used to go after small fry) were first-time relists last week. [read post]
1 Apr 2014, 8:31 am
§ 2254(d)(1) when it granted habeas relief even though there is no clearly established Supreme Court precedent which holds that in respondent’s case the state violated the Sixth Amendment; and (2) whether the Ninth Circuit improperly disregarded its obligation under Fry v. [read post]
