Search for: "Frye v. United States"
Results 1 - 20
of 259
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 May 2012, 7:53 pm
The United States Supreme Court recently addressed this issue in Missouri v. [read post]
14 Aug 2013, 11:06 am
United States, 293 F. 1013 (D.C. [read post]
21 Oct 2016, 4:54 pm
United States, 293 F. 1013 (D.C. [read post]
26 Mar 2014, 6:55 am
United States, 293 F. 1013 (D.C. [read post]
21 May 2012, 7:49 pm
This is a follow up to my last post, where I discussed an opinion issued by the United States Supreme Court, Missouri v. [read post]
7 Aug 2018, 6:30 am
Tompkins (1938), the United States Supreme Court famously reversed, holding that federal courts sitting in diversity must apply state substantive law, not federal "general common law. [read post]
6 Apr 2012, 10:00 am
Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, 509 U.S. 579 (1993), the United States Supreme Court drove a stake through the heart of the old Frye test for the admissibility of expert evidence at the federal level. [read post]
15 Aug 2018, 11:22 am
Tompkins (1938), the United States Supreme Court famously reversed, holding that federal courts sitting in diversity must apply state substantive law, not federal "general common law. [read post]
15 Aug 2018, 11:22 am
Tompkins (1938), the United States Supreme Court famously reversed, holding that federal courts sitting in diversity must apply state substantive law, not federal "general common law. [read post]
27 Feb 2013, 5:59 am
United States, 293 F. 1013 (D.C. [read post]
30 May 2019, 5:00 am
United States, 293 F. 1013 (D.C. [read post]
28 Mar 2015, 1:41 pm
On a previous appeal, affirming the denial of defendants' motions to dismiss, inter alia, for failure to state a cause of action, we determined that plaintiffs' expert evidence did not require that a hearing be held in accordance with Frye v. [read post]
31 Oct 2016, 7:18 am
Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc., 509 U.S. 579 (1993), the United States Supreme Court replaced the old Frye test for determining the admissibility of expert evidence with the new Daubert, pursuant to which judges serve as gatekeepers and... [read post]
7 Jun 2019, 7:39 am
In Frye v. [read post]
7 Jun 2019, 7:39 am
In Frye v. [read post]
7 Jun 2019, 7:39 am
In Frye v. [read post]
7 Jun 2019, 7:39 am
In Frye v. [read post]
25 May 2007, 7:00 am
The Maryland Supreme Court agreed with the Court of Appeals unanimous decision that a Frye-Reed hearing is necessary to determine the validity of expert witness testimony in the case of Josephine Chesson, et al. v. [read post]
16 May 2018, 6:45 am
United States, 293 F. 1013 (D.C. [read post]
31 Oct 2011, 2:55 am
The United States Supreme Court is scheduled to hear arguments on October 31 2011 in the case of Lafler v. [read post]
