Search for: "Furry v. United States" Results 1 - 13 of 13
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Feb 2020, 11:28 pm
Likewise, the United Kingdom Intellectual Property Office (UKIPO) held repeatedly that comparable strategies could constitute bad faith [e.g. here, here and here]. [read post]
12 Oct 2017, 9:19 am by John Elwood
For example, a case with a caption like United States v. [read post]
5 Dec 2015, 5:43 pm by W.F. Casey Ebsary, Jr.
The United States Supreme Court’s decision is Florida v. [read post]
30 Jun 2015, 2:54 pm
The advantage of a furry face:no-one can see you blushJustia Blawgsearch. [read post]
28 Sep 2012, 12:58 pm by National Indian Law Library
Supreme Court Bulletin http://www.narf.org/nill/bulletins/sct/currentsct.htmlPetitions for certiorari were filed in Furry v. [read post]
13 Jul 2012, 6:14 am by South Florida Lawyers
Miccosukee Tribe of Indians of Florida, 166 F.3d 1126, 1135 (11th Cir. 1999) (“Tribal sovereign immunity does not bar suits by the United States. [read post]
25 Nov 2011, 6:47 am
At the MARQUES Conference in Baveno this year, a genuine IPKat shares a quiet moment with a furry fake  The IPKat's friend and fellow blogger Howard ("Excess Copyright") Knopf has drawn his attention to the alarming news of allegations that real furs are being passed off as faux fur (here) and that the Humane Society of the United States has filed a legal petition with the Federal Trade Commission, alleging that eleven retailers have falsely… [read post]
15 Aug 2010, 3:15 am
Here the courts in England and Wales were struggling to ascertain the intended meaning of clauses of a licence intended to take effect in the United States, where the gap between a brand's profile-raising strategy for football (a.k.a. soccer) apparel and the manner of its execution could be measured in light years. [read post]