Search for: "G.L. "
Results 21 - 40
of 547
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Nov 2010, 10:14 am
The new rule governs "Attorney General Approved Modifications Of Certain Gift Instruments Under G.L. [read post]
10 Nov 2015, 8:06 am
Private landowners allowing public access to land should take note of recent court decisions which have refined the scope of the Recreational Use Statute, G.L. c. 21, § 17C (“Statute”). [read post]
10 Nov 2015, 8:06 am
Private landowners allowing public access to land should take note of recent court decisions which have refined the scope of the Recreational Use Statute, G.L. c. 21, § 17C (“Statute”). [read post]
5 Sep 2021, 6:35 am
G.L. c. 90, § 24G(b). [read post]
12 Jan 2017, 7:53 pm
The plaintiffs are mothers of children where guardians have been appointed pursuant to G.L. c. 190B, Sec. 5-206. [read post]
18 May 2010, 6:14 am
”After holding that G.L. c. 186 §15 applied to commercial leases, an issue that had not previously been decided by the court, the Supreme Judicial Court next addressed whether the indemnity provision in the lease was void under G.L. c. 186 §15. [read post]
18 May 2010, 6:14 am
”After holding that G.L. c. 186 §15 applied to commercial leases, an issue that had not previously been decided by the court, the Supreme Judicial Court next addressed whether the indemnity provision in the lease was void under G.L. c. 186 §15. [read post]
28 Jun 2020, 10:55 am
At arraignment, the Commonwealth moved for pretrial detention pursuant to G.L. c.276, §58A. [read post]
17 Feb 2011, 11:46 am
G.L. c. 90, § 24 (1)(c )(3) reads in part: "the registrar shall not restore the license or reinstate the right to operate to such person, unless the prosecution of such person has terminated in favor of the defendant, until eight years after the date of conviction. [read post]
Massachusetts Appeals Court Reverses Trial Court Opinion in Favor of Passenger Injured by a City Bus
11 Jan 2017, 5:47 am
The MBTA appealed, arguing that the notice did not comply with G.L. c. 258, § 4. [read post]
Massachusetts Appeals Court Reverses Trial Court Opinion in Favor of Passenger Injured by a City Bus
11 Jan 2017, 5:47 am
The MBTA appealed, arguing that the notice did not comply with G.L. c. 258, § 4. [read post]
15 Aug 2017, 6:55 am
On the defendant’s motion, the judge reported the following question …: ‘Whether a defendant with two prior convictions for [OUI], pursuant to G.L. c.90, [§24(1)(a)(1)], who is arrested and charged with [OUI], [t]hird [o]ffense, may be held without the right to bail pursuant to G.L. c.276, [§58A(1)]. [read post]
23 Jun 2014, 8:42 am
G.L. [read post]
28 Sep 2015, 4:56 am
Last week, the Third Circuit handed down a major special education law decision, G.L. v. [read post]
6 Oct 2017, 6:00 am
Sachdev (SJC-1222)issued its first interpretation of the Massachusetts G.L. c. 156D, section 14.30, the Massachusetts corporate dissolution statute, and held that a 50% shareholder who had demonstrated “true deadlock” could proceed with a petition for involuntary dissolution.READ MORE [read post]
10 Sep 2014, 6:52 am
Sullivan was found guilty of violating G.L. c. 272, sec. 53, which sets forth the statutory penalty for prostitution as well as “persons […] [read post]
12 Apr 2022, 10:57 am
City of Methuen, that the Massachusetts Wage Act, G.L. c. 149, § 148, requires courts to award triple damages to successful plaintiffs paid their wages late—even if their employer paid them in full and regardless of whether the wages were paid one day or one year after they were owed. [read post]
TENNESSEE FOLLOWS WISCONSIN’S LEAD: “The Senate Education Committee voted along party lines Wednesd…
17 Feb 2011, 8:06 pm
” UPDATE: Reader G.L. [read post]
6 Oct 2017, 6:00 am
Sachdev (SJC-1222)issued its first interpretation of the Massachusetts G.L. c. 156D, section 14.30, the Massachusetts corporate dissolution statute, and held that a 50% shareholder who had demonstrated “true deadlock” could proceed with a petition for involuntary dissolution.READ MORE [read post]
5 Feb 2019, 3:06 pm
On January 29, 2019, the Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court held that failing to grant a lateral transfer for discriminatory reasons may constitute an “adverse employment action” that violates Massachusetts law, G.L. c. [read post]
