Search for: "GANT V US"
Results 1 - 20
of 298
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Apr 2009, 1:12 pm
Police officers went to a house suspected of being used for narcotics activity. [read post]
10 Dec 2010, 10:59 am
While Gant claimed that he received one [...] [read post]
1 Jul 2011, 12:37 pm
S781a) situation where he was stopped, secured, and his car was later searched under Belton (New York v., 453 US 454 (1981)) precedent. [read post]
11 Jul 2008, 8:16 pm
In Gant's view, a two-step test should be used to determine the validity of a search incident to arrest. [read post]
19 Mar 2010, 11:20 am
Police officers had begun to treat the SITA of a vehicle as a powerful investigative tool, using traffic stops and arrests to get a free search for evidence of more serious crimes At least as a formal matter, Arizona v Gant changed all this. [read post]
31 Aug 2009, 9:23 am
This precedent requires us to apply Gant to the current case without the overlay of an application of the good faith exception. [read post]
15 Jul 2010, 4:18 am
State v. [read post]
21 Apr 2009, 10:12 pm
Gant. [read post]
7 Nov 2011, 5:16 am
State v. [read post]
11 Feb 2011, 6:35 am
United States v. [read post]
27 May 2010, 4:45 am
Defense counsel was not ineffective for not forecasting Gant. [read post]
19 Mar 2011, 8:34 am
Gant (2009). [read post]
26 Feb 2010, 10:07 am
State v. [read post]
22 Apr 2009, 7:10 am
The case is Arizona v. [read post]
17 Aug 2010, 8:54 pm
The use of the flashlight was not a search. [read post]
1 Nov 2009, 9:50 am
United States v. [read post]
4 Jan 2013, 2:32 pm
Gant. [read post]
22 Oct 2009, 11:30 pm
October 16, 2009): [*P33] In the case before us, the search is not justified under either branch of the standard established in Gant. [read post]
11 Aug 2012, 4:09 am
In this case, the government has not asked us to hold that Gant created a per se rule, and we decline to do so sua sponte. [read post]
6 Apr 2012, 5:46 am
State v. [read post]
