Search for: "GAUNT v. GAUNT."
Results 1 - 20
of 50
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Jul 2010, 1:00 am
On 13 July, Sir Anthony May, the President of the Queen’s Bench Division, and Mr Justice Blair handed down their judgment in R (Gaunt) v Ofcom. [read post]
21 Jun 2011, 2:17 am
Regina (Gaunt) v Office of Communications (Liberty intervening) [2011] EWCA Civ 692; [2011] WLR (D) 201 “The provisions of the Ofcom Broadcasting Code had to be interpreted, as well as being applied in a particular case, so as to comply with the requirements of the right to freedom of expression in article 10 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms. [read post]
16 Jul 2010, 2:20 am
Regina (Gaunt) v Ofcom (Liberty intervening) [2010] EWHC 1756 (Admin); [2010] WLR (D) 180 “It was not a disproportionate interference with a broadcaster’s freedom of expression, or an infringement of his rights under art 10 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms, for the regulator Ofcom to find that the Broadcasting Code had been breached by a broadcast interview containing offensive insults and abuse without contextual content or… [read post]
23 Mar 2023, 5:51 pm
On 27 February 2023 judgment was handed down in the case of FGX v Gaunt [2023] EWHC 419 (KB). [read post]
19 Jun 2011, 9:54 am
Gaunt, R (ota) v. [read post]
13 Jul 2010, 3:07 am
Gaunt v OFCOM [2010] EWHC 1756 (QB) (13 July 2010) – Read judgment The High Court has ruled that OFCOM did not breach a DJ’s freedom of expression rights by finding that he contravened the Broadcasting Code after calling a guest a “Nazi” during an interview on talkSPORT. [read post]
2 May 2012, 7:51 am
Stewart as John of Gaunt. [read post]
14 Mar 2014, 10:20 am
In a good reminder about the importance of legal analysis, Judge Posner had some choice words for the attorneys who filed the opening brief in the case of Central States v. [read post]
14 Jun 2007, 8:10 am
Emerald Investors Trust v. [read post]
8 Sep 2013, 7:40 am
City of Lawrence v. [read post]
12 Aug 2015, 11:20 am
Case citation: US v. [read post]
17 Jun 2011, 11:47 am
Gaunt’s insults had just been one aspect of an interview which, taken as a whole, crossed the line beyond acceptable expression (at [39]): It would be wrong to focus too hard individually, let alone exclusively, on (i) Mr Gaunt’s specific insults, such as “health Nazi” or “ignorant pig”, (ii) his hectoring tone and bullying manner, (iii) his persistent interruptions, (iv) his failure to let Mr Stark develop any argument or even answer the points… [read post]
14 Jul 2010, 11:28 pm
Starting closer to home, though,(and with much less discussion as far as I’ve found) we have the High Court decision in Gaunt v Ofcom [2010] EWHC 1756 (QB). [read post]
6 Mar 2023, 1:41 am
On 27 February 2023, judgment was handed down in FGX v Gaunt [2023] EWHC 419 (KB) by Thornton J, thought to be the first civil case on intimate-image abuse (commonly referred to as “revenge porn”) of its kind. [read post]
7 Nov 2008, 1:30 pm
State v. [read post]
12 May 2014, 4:33 am
The case is Central States, Southeast and Southwest Areas Health and Welfare Fund v. [read post]
14 Jul 2010, 3:06 am
Court of Appeal (Civil Division) Yetkin v London Borough of Newham [2010] EWCA Civ 776 (13 July 2010) Badger Trust v The Welsh Ministers [2010] EWCA Civ 807 (13 July 2010) Ghadami & Anor v Lyon Cole Insurance Group Ltd [2010] EWCA Civ 767 (13 July 2010) FlooHorridge (t/a Newford Parts Centre) v Downshire House (Reproductions) Ltd [2010] EWCA Civ 777 (13 July 2010) Court of Appeal (Criminal Division) Willett & Anor v R. [2010] EWCA Crim 1620 (13… [read post]
1 Feb 2008, 4:30 am
Cowperthwait, Slip Copy, 2007 WL 1964157 (S.D.N.Y., Jul 03, 2007).Gaunt v. [read post]
15 Jul 2010, 1:41 am
R (Gaunt) v Ofcom [2010] EWHC 1756 (Admin) QBD (Admin) – 13 Jul 2010. [read post]
21 Jun 2011, 12:28 am
Gaunt, R (on the application of) v The Office of Communications [2011] EWCA Civ 692 (17 June 2011): Ofcom right to find John Gaunt “health Nazi” radio interview breached broadcasting code, rules court of appeal – see David Hart QC’s post. [read post]
