Search for: "GAY v. WALLACE" Results 1 - 20 of 26
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Jan 2009, 9:03 am
The Ninth Circuit is working on an intriguing idea of injury sufficient to confer standing in a Barnes-Wallace v. [read post]
10 Aug 2010, 8:35 am by South Florida Lawyers
  That's why it is unconstitutional to deprive gay couples from the institution of marriage, because there are no legitimate empirical or utilitarian justifications to support the deprivation.The fact that some whites still hate blacks doesn't mean Loving v. [read post]
31 Dec 2008, 10:30 am
" But something that may be overlooked in thinking about Loving v. [read post]
4 Apr 2010, 10:45 am by Howard Friedman
Secunda, District Court Amicus Brief of Law Professors in Support of Defendants, Associated Oregon Industries v. [read post]
18 Jun 2020, 6:38 am by Linda McClain
” But precisely because racism now stands—or should stand—as a primary example of properly-repudiated bigotry, present-day rhetoric of bigotry is highly charged for it carries with it evocations of this repudiated past.In Masterpiece Cakeshop v. [read post]
3 Jul 2012, 4:49 am by Adrian Lurssen
Estate and Gift Taxes McNees Wallace & Nurick in Staffing Talk: Staffing News Of The Day, May 25, 2012 Osler in GLOBE-Net: Canadian Environmental Assessment Act Review Report Heenan Blaikie in The Hollywood Reporter: Hollywood Docket: Jimmy Buffett Settles Martiniville Flap; Pirate Bay Removes Torrent Links; and More CATO Institute in TIME: What if the Supreme Court Kills Rent Control? [read post]
6 Dec 2020, 4:45 pm by INFORRM
Media Law in Other Jurisdictions  Australia  In Gayed v Abdelmalek [2020] VCC 1814 a man has been awarded $120,000 in damages and $85,000 in legal costs after winning a defamation battle against a fellow churchgoer over Facebook posts branding him a scammer. [read post]
20 Jun 2012, 12:38 pm by Charon QC
  We look at gay marriage – problem families – no-fault divorce – forced marriages. [read post]
21 Feb 2012, 3:26 am by INFORRM
Dacre v Grant Despite Steve Coogan’s claim that “This is not, in case the press try to portray it that way, the Steve and Hugh show”, the dispute between Hugh Grant and Daily Mail editor Paul Dacre bookended module one. [read post]