Search for: "GENERAL TELEPHONE COMPANY OF SOUTHWEST v. STATE"
Results 1 - 20
of 38
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
31 May 2013, 11:53 am
Finkel We’ve known since the Supreme Court’s 1982 decision in General Telephone Company of Southwest v. [read post]
16 May 2015, 2:44 pm
CASE STYLE: State of Texas v Samara Portfolio Management, LLC et al; Cause No. 2013-35721 in the 80th Judicial District Court of Texas (Harris County) [read post]
23 Sep 2013, 6:30 am
Serv., 3d 661 (2007) (stating that “Rule 23 requires ‘rigorous analysis’ to ensure that class certification is appropriate”) (citing General Telephone Co. of Southwest v. [read post]
23 Sep 2013, 6:30 am
Serv., 3d 661 (2007) (stating that “Rule 23 requires ‘rigorous analysis’ to ensure that class certification is appropriate”) (citing General Telephone Co. of Southwest v. [read post]
19 Feb 2010, 4:00 pm
CERTIFIED CLASS IN ACTION SEEKING REMEDY FOR OVERCHARGES FOR TELEPHONE SERVICE UNDONESWBT Co. v. [read post]
20 Jun 2011, 8:41 am
(b) General Telephone Co. of Southwest v. [read post]
24 Jun 2011, 1:24 pm
Carlisle & Jacquelin, 417 U.S. 156 (1974), and General Telephone Co. of the Southwest v. [read post]
30 Nov 2015, 1:25 pm
United States, 48 F. [read post]
20 Jun 2011, 3:41 pm
" Quoting General Telephone Co. of Southwest v. [read post]
5 Dec 2010, 4:27 pm
Southwest v. [read post]
25 Jun 2015, 3:02 pm
With the Supreme Court’s much anticipated June 25, 2015 King v. [read post]
1 May 2009, 5:00 am
Moreover, the Company: Purchased an extensive collection of historical maps of the American Southwest, together with certain books, watercolors and photographs, from Mr. [read post]
28 Sep 2015, 2:10 pm
Department of Labor Wage and Hour Division (DOL) resulting from an investigation conducted as part of an ongoing, multi-year compliance initiative by the DOL targeting oil and gas industry employers in the Southwest and Northeast as part of the Obama Administration’s tough Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA) enforcement stance against employers generally. [read post]
17 Nov 2020, 11:23 am
(Lawfare) State of Maryland v. [read post]
31 May 2016, 4:05 pm
Plans that previously disclose or intend in the future to disclose protected health information to a state all payer data base in Vermont or another state generally will want to carefully document their justification, if any for making that disclosure under the Privacy Rule. [read post]
23 Jan 2017, 2:47 pm
The likelihood of state statutory or regulatory restrictions on insured arrangements is particularly likely because of the heavy regulation of these products by states including the widespread incorporation of ACA mandates into state insurance laws and regulations in response to the Market Reform provisions of the ACA. [read post]
30 Jun 2015, 10:53 am
With the Obama Administration construing the United States Supreme Court’s King v. [read post]
18 Apr 2008, 2:00 am
, Global Global - General Candidates for post of WIPO Director General present their platforms: (WIPO), IP is not a thing: (Dilanchian), FOSS adoption and consumer welfare: (IPcentral) Global - Trade Marks / Domain Names / Brands Manufacturers becoming brand licensing companies: (IP ThinkTank), Anti-Counterfeiting Trade Agreement moves forward: (Michael Geist) Global - Patents Office Open XML voted to become official standard, so out of… [read post]
21 Aug 2015, 6:07 pm
The Supreme Court’s recent King v. [read post]
14 Mar 2010, 10:47 pm
” Click Here Railroad Company to Pay $4 Million Penalty for 2005 Chlorine Spill in Graniteville, SC. [read post]
