Search for: "GIBBS v. GIBBS"
Results 21 - 40
of 289
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Dec 2022, 12:49 am
Canada On 29 November 2022, judgement was handed down in Kaur v. [read post]
10 Nov 2022, 3:03 pm
" The speakers are Andre Mura of Gibbs Law Group LLP; Zoe Savitsky of the Oakland City Attorney's Office; Steven E. [read post]
3 Oct 2022, 12:04 pm
See Schulz v. [read post]
21 Aug 2022, 12:35 am
And finally…II Per Julian Knowles J in Al-Masarir v Kingdom of Saudi Arabia [2022] EWHC 2199 (QB) at [195]: “There are shades of Mandy Rice-Davies in this explanation — ‘they would say that, wouldn’t they? [read post]
5 Aug 2022, 10:08 am
From Thaler v. [read post]
3 Aug 2022, 2:21 am
Gibbs & Allyson B. [read post]
12 Jul 2022, 1:18 pm
Loveday v. [read post]
6 Jul 2022, 2:41 pm
Gibbs (Bronx Cty. [read post]
1 Jul 2022, 9:03 pm
Although the petitioner failed to offer a reasonable excuse for his failure to timely serve the notice of claim, "the absence of a reasonable excuse is not fatal to the petition where there was actual notice and absence of prejudice" (Matter of Regan v City of New York, 131 AD3d at 1066; see Matter of Brownstein v Incorporated Vil. of Hempstead, 52 AD3d 507, 510; Gibbs v City of New York, 22 AD3d 717, 720; cf. [read post]
1 Jul 2022, 9:03 pm
Although the petitioner failed to offer a reasonable excuse for his failure to timely serve the notice of claim, "the absence of a reasonable excuse is not fatal to the petition where there was actual notice and absence of prejudice" (Matter of Regan v City of New York, 131 AD3d at 1066; see Matter of Brownstein v Incorporated Vil. of Hempstead, 52 AD3d 507, 510; Gibbs v City of New York, 22 AD3d 717, 720; cf. [read post]
6 Jun 2022, 5:53 pm
Gibbs & Sara W. [read post]
23 May 2022, 5:00 am
Christopher V. [read post]
30 Jan 2022, 1:01 pm
Golding v Martin (2022) EW Misc 2 (CC) We first saw this forfeiture case when it went to the Court of Appeal (our note). [read post]
16 Dec 2021, 10:48 pm
Significant costs, and much valuable court time, is taken up re-arguing identical points of principle in costs litigation due to the absence of a binding authority. [read post]
7 Dec 2021, 8:44 am
Some people are getting this priceless protection, and others are not, with little justification for the different treatment but just because they drew a judge who is more open to pseudonymity or because the judge found their plight to be specially sympathetic. [1] See Hundtofte v. [read post]
1 Nov 2021, 3:20 am
/ p. 532-542 Abstract This article discusses the recent judgment of the District Court of The Hague in Milieudefensie et al. v. [read post]
5 Oct 2021, 8:21 am
Professor of Law & Director of Clinical Legal Education, UC Davis School of Law--Robert Cover as Critical Race Theorist Mark Graber, University System of Maryland Regents Professor, University of Maryland Carey School of Law & Sandford V. [read post]
17 Aug 2021, 6:40 pm
Briefly, Gibbs was decided in the 1890s. [read post]
23 Jul 2021, 11:20 am
Tex. 2005) (Jack, J.)). [9] Mississippi Valley Silica Co. v. [read post]
30 Mar 2021, 8:32 pm
Additional Resources: Gibbs v. [read post]
