Search for: "GILL v. HILL" Results 1 - 20 of 71
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 May 2018, 4:21 am by Edith Roberts
” In an op-ed for The Hill, Jonathan Wood and Michelle Minton weigh in on Murphy v. [read post]
2 Dec 2011, 3:19 am by tracey
Supreme Court McGowan (Procurator Fiscal) v B (Scotland) [2011] UKSC 54 (23 November 2011) Jude v Her Majesty’s Advocate (Scotland) (Rev 1) [2011] UKSC 55 (23 November 2011) Court of Appeal (Civil Division) Samarenko v Dawn Hill House Ltd [2011] EWCA civ 1445 (01 December 2011) Oso v Newham University Hospital NHS Trust [2011] EWCA Civ 1423 (01 December 2011) Francis v London Borough of Southwark [2011] EWCA Civ 1418 (01 December 2011)… [read post]
23 Oct 2017, 4:11 am by Edith Roberts
” In an op-ed for The Hill, Charles Sauer looks at Oil States Energy Services v. [read post]
20 Jun 2017, 4:29 am by Edith Roberts
Yesterday the Supreme Court agreed to hear a high-profile partisan-gerrymandering case from Wisconsin, Gill v. [read post]
20 Jun 2018, 4:10 am by Edith Roberts
The dust continues to settle from the court’s unanimous rulings on Monday in two partisan-gerrymandering cases, Gill v. [read post]
30 Oct 2012, 8:02 pm by Ben Cheng
The petitions of the day are: Massachusetts v. [read post]
4 Sep 2012, 8:21 pm by Ben Cheng
The petition of the day is: Bipartisan Legal Advisory Group of the United States House of Representatives v. [read post]
25 Oct 2017, 4:11 am by Edith Roberts
” At the Brennan Center for Justice, Ciara Torres-Spelliscy stresses the importance of Gill v. [read post]
26 Jul 2017, 12:05 pm
The second case, Intermarine v. [read post]
14 Nov 2018, 12:15 pm by Kevin
infiltrated his team and witnessed them using gill nets to catch American paddlefish. [read post]
26 Oct 2017, 3:52 am by Edith Roberts
” In an op-ed for The Hill, Scott Sundby weighs in on Ayestas v. [read post]
21 May 2014, 6:54 am
Gill, Second Circuit: Appellant's collateral challenge to his order of deportation was denied by the district court, which relied on the fact that §212(c) of the Immigration and Nationality Act had been repealed. [read post]