Search for: "GILLE v. STATE"
Results 101 - 120
of 691
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 May 2011, 9:36 pm
On May 9, 2011, United States District Judge David C. [read post]
20 Jan 2012, 6:27 am
See Hawaii v. [read post]
Federal Judge rejects DOMA's denial of federal recognition of same-sex marriages valid in the states
28 Jul 2010, 12:08 pm
Gill v. [read post]
13 Jun 2018, 12:23 pm
Some holdups are still in play, including the long-since-argued case of Gill v. [read post]
9 Aug 2010, 11:46 am
Jeanne Gills (partner at Foley & Lardner and Practice Center Contributor) and Mary M. [read post]
9 Jul 2010, 2:11 pm
Evans and Lawrence v. [read post]
26 Jun 2018, 5:58 pm
Finally, too little attention has been paid to the implications for the national injunction of a case decided last week: Gill v. [read post]
15 Oct 2019, 3:57 pm
The judgment in Kassam v Gill sets out the wording of the PDF generated in that case:"Statement of TruthI believe that the facts stated in this form are trueSigned MrMrs Harjit / Jagbir Gill date 09 May 2018ClaimantFull name Mr/Mrs Harjit / Jagbir Gill"Perhaps unsurprisingly, the judge commented about the automatic name insertion system: "No doubt that makes the form less time consuming to complete, but it is not a happy fit with the… [read post]
9 Aug 2017, 11:24 am
’” In Gill v. [read post]
6 Nov 2017, 12:31 pm
Facts: This case (Plunkett v. [read post]
3 Oct 2017, 8:20 am
This is the second in a series about Gill v. [read post]
20 Sep 2021, 6:01 am
Gilles' view, not my own, but I think our readers will find it interesting. [read post]
15 May 2017, 4:41 am
Briefly: In The New York Times, Adam Liptak looks at Gill v. [read post]
22 Dec 2015, 4:07 pm
Gill Phillips is the Director of Editorial Legal Services at Guardian News & Media [read post]
28 Mar 2014, 1:32 pm
R. v. [read post]
22 Sep 2007, 11:13 am
The preview of Gilles v. [read post]
8 Aug 2017, 11:56 am
This simple truth has been difficult for the plaintiffs in Gill v. [read post]
20 Jun 2017, 4:29 am
Yesterday the Supreme Court agreed to hear a high-profile partisan-gerrymandering case from Wisconsin, Gill v. [read post]
8 Jun 2016, 5:01 am
Counsel for the IRS explained in the motion that he had discussed the motion with Gill, who stated he no longer had any involvement with Allied and did not intend to proceed any further with the case. [read post]
3 Oct 2017, 3:01 am
“The justices tackle partisan gerrymandering again: In Plain English” [Amy Howe, SCOTUSBlog, earlier on Gill v. [read post]
