Search for: "GIVENS v. W. T. GRANT CO." Results 121 - 140 of 618
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Apr 2021, 7:23 am by Giles Peaker
(No, I don’t understand why either.) [read post]
17 Mar 2021, 9:57 am by Phil Dixon
Given that law enforcement corroborated much of the information from the co-defendant, this was not a false statement. [read post]
18 Feb 2021, 12:37 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
If private originality suggests granting protection but public knowledge doesn’t, which should prevail? [read post]
8 Feb 2021, 1:00 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
The second is T W Logistics Ltd v Essex County Council & Anor. [read post]
7 Feb 2021, 1:01 pm by Josh Blackman
[This post was co-authored by Josh Blackman and Seth Barrett Tillman] On Thursday, February 4, 2021, we discussed the First Amendment arguments in the House of Representatives' Managers' trial memorandum. [read post]
25 Jan 2021, 5:35 am by Bob Ambrogi
v=eTgdQYdH2z4&t=28s Target customer: Mediators, neutrals, and ADR professionals. [read post]
13 Jan 2021, 12:41 pm by Robert Guite and Abby Meyer
A&W Concentrate Co., Case No. 1:19-cv-00768 (E.D.N.Y.), the court found that the label claim “MADE WITH AGED VANILLA” suggested to consumers that the vanilla content was naturally derived and had acquired a desirable quality upon the passage of time. [read post]
13 Jan 2021, 12:41 pm by Robert Guite and Abby Meyer
A&W Concentrate Co., Case No. 1:19-cv-00768 (E.D.N.Y.), the court found that the label claim “MADE WITH AGED VANILLA” suggested to consumers that the vanilla content was naturally derived and had acquired a desirable quality upon the passage of time. [read post]
13 Jan 2021, 12:41 pm by Robert Guite and Abby Meyer
A&W Concentrate Co., Case No. 1:19-cv-00768 (E.D.N.Y.), the court found that the label claim “MADE WITH AGED VANILLA” suggested to consumers that the vanilla content was naturally derived and had acquired a desirable quality upon the passage of time. [read post]
22 Dec 2020, 9:15 am by Eugene Volokh
The trial court rejected the accusations, and granted the father sole custody: [T]he trial court concluded that Father did not sexually abuse Child. [read post]
30 Nov 2020, 1:00 am by Jocelyn Hutton
On Wednesday 02 and Thursday 03 December, the Supreme Court will hear the case of T W Logistics Ltd v Essex County Council & Anor. [read post]
12 Oct 2020, 8:05 pm by Marty Lederman
Kennedy, Barack Obama and Mitt Romney, this year I also assigned two other readings:  a 1998 article co-written by Amy V. [read post]
22 Sep 2020, 4:45 pm by Eugene Volokh
The order is properly seen as a preliminary injunction because it was not granted ex parte, cf. [read post]