Search for: "GIVENS v. WAL-MART STORES, INC" Results 81 - 100 of 359
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 May 2016, 3:17 am
" TrafFix, 58 USPQ2d at 1005 (quoting Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. [read post]
28 Apr 2010, 11:32 am by AALRR
Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., a divided Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals decided 6-5 en banc to affirm the decision of the trial court to grant class certification in a discrimination lawsuit alleging Wal-Mart Stores discriminates against its women employees. [read post]
22 Jul 2016, 12:18 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
  Wal-Mart argued that it couldn’t get addresses for those who purchased from its online store because the entity operating Wal-Mart.com—Wal-Mart.com USA, LLC—wasn’t the entity Duran sued, which was Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. [read post]
29 Mar 2013, 9:27 am by Epstein Becker & Green, P.C.
 The bell-weather case in that regard is Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. [read post]
23 Sep 2019, 7:18 am by MBettman
Wal-Mart Stores E., L.P., 2014-Ohio-2998 (2nd Dist (In case involving motorized carts at Wal-Mart, appeals court held that lack of customer training on use of carts insufficient to establish lack of training caused plaintiff’s injury.) [read post]
6 Jul 2011, 9:56 am by Josh Wright
Regulatory approval won’t be a hurdle because of more competition from Wal-Mart Stores Inc. [read post]
24 Dec 2016, 6:47 pm by req@quintilone.com
  It means that courts in California are narrowing the scope of applicability of Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. [read post]
22 Feb 2011, 7:27 pm by Gerald L. Maatman, Jr.
Wal-Mart Stores is one of the most closely watched cases in years given the stakes for employers in employment discrimination class actions. [read post]
22 Feb 2011, 7:27 pm by Gerald L. Maatman, Jr.
Wal-Mart Stores is one of the most closely watched cases in years given the stakes for employers in employment discrimination class actions. [read post]
7 Dec 2010, 2:46 am
Mass. 2005) (denying motion to compel inspection where “any benefit from the inspection ... is outweighed by the burdens that such inspection will impose”). 18 Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. [read post]