Search for: "GIVENS v. WAL-MART STORES EAST, LP" Results 1 - 15 of 15
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Apr 2023, 5:00 am
Wal-Mart Stores East, LP, No. 2:22-CV-00495-CCW (W.D. [read post]
4 Sep 2016, 8:08 am by Benjamin S. Persons, IV
Wal-Mart Stores East LP Proving whether an “unreasonably dangerous” condition exists often requires a careful examination of the facts surrounding a particular accident. [read post]
4 Sep 2016, 8:08 am by Benjamin S. Persons, IV
Wal-Mart Stores East LP Proving whether an “unreasonably dangerous” condition exists often requires a careful examination of the facts surrounding a particular accident. [read post]
25 Oct 2013, 3:56 am by Lorene Park
The ADA does not require an employer to place an employee on permanent light duty or give other workers an employee’s assignments to accommodate a physical impairment (Josey v Wal-Mart Stores East, LP). [read post]
11 Jul 2013, 6:20 pm by Joy Waltemath
The Southern District of Alabama found  (Denham v Wal-Mart Stores East, LP, March 26, 2013) that any employee’s use of the n-word was “patently offensive,” but an “isolated utterance on a single occasion,” not directed at anyone in the workplace, was a stray remark that failed to meet the legal threshold for a cognizable Title VII claim. [read post]
20 Mar 2013, 4:20 am by Lorene Park
For example, in Muhammad v Wal-Mart Stores East, LP, a federal court sua sponte sanctioned an employee’s attorney who tried to avoid summary judgment by “disingenuously” arguing that an unpleaded gender bias claim had merit and could be pursued simply because the employee checked the Title VII box on his form complaint (WDNY 2012). [read post]
7 Nov 2014, 5:52 am
 “Where warning is given, the seller may reasonably assume that it will be read and heeded. [read post]
18 Oct 2006, 5:26 pm
And, given the essential nature of the transport of crude oil by TAPS, and the potentially serious consequences of a work stoppage, either on the pipeline or at the VMT, increasing the likelihood of a disruption by finding a less than systemwide unit to be appropriate is unacceptable. [read post]