Search for: "GMBH" Results 41 - 60 of 2,548
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Nov 2020, 3:28 am
Jane Lambert Patents Court (Mr Justice Birss) IPCom GmbH & Co Kg v HTC Europe Co Ltd and others [2020] EWHC 2941 (Pat) (4 Nov 2020)This was an application by the defendants to strike out part of the points of claim in an inquiry as to the claimant's damages for patent infringement that had been ordered by the Chancellor, Sir Geoffrey Vos, on 17 Dec 2019. [read post]
27 Jul 2012, 2:04 am by sally
Johann MK Blumenthal GmbH & Co KG and another v Itochu Corpn [2012] EWCA Civ 996; [2012] WLR (D) 225 “The Court of Appeal did not have jurisdiction to hear an appeal from a judge who had made a decision under section 18 of the Arbitration Act 1996 and had refused permission to appeal under section 18(5) of that Act. [read post]
21 Nov 2008, 10:06 am
Biffa Waste Services Ltd and Another v Maschinenfabrik Ernst Hese GmbH and Another Court of Appeal “The principle which made an employer liable for the negligence of a subcontractor engaged to carry out extra-hazardous or dangerous operations was unsaisfactory and should be applied as narrowly as possible. [read post]
14 Nov 2008, 9:53 am
Biffa Waste Services Ltd and another v Maschinenfabrik Ernst Hese GmbH and others [2008] EWCA Civ 1238; [2008] WLR (D) 353 “The principle that a person who employed an independent contractor would be liable for the negligence of that independent contractor where the independent contractor was engaged to carry out extra-hazardous or dangerous operations was binding on the Court of Appeal but its application should be kept as narrow as possible. [read post]
19 Nov 2010, 3:32 am by traceydennis
Football Dataco Ltd and others v Sportradar GmbH and another [2010] EWHC 2911 (Ch); [2010] WLR (D) 293 “The act of making available to the public all or a substantial part of the contents of a database by online transmission within the meaning of art 7(2)(b) of Parliament and Council Directive 96/9/EC on the Legal Protection of Databases was committed and committed only where the transmission took place. [read post]
21 Jan 2019, 9:20 pm by Patent Docs
UCB Pharma GmbH, and once again reviewed whether a failed petitioner in an inter partes review (IPR) proceeding had standing to appeal an adverse judgment. [read post]
6 Oct 2021, 9:11 pm by Patent Docs
In September, the Federal Circuit affirmed an exclusion order by the Commission in Jennewein Biotechnologie GmbH v. [read post]
22 Aug 2019, 9:59 pm by Patent Docs
LABOKLIN GmbH, the Federal Circuit affirmed a decision by the U.S. [read post]
22 May 2018, 7:53 pm by Patent Docs
LABOklin GmbH, Senior District Judge Henry Coke Morgan, Jr. of the U.S. [read post]
19 Nov 2019, 9:29 pm by Patent Docs
(KPN) sued Gemalto M2M GmbH (Gemalto) and several other parties in the District of Delaware for infringement of its U.S. [read post]
23 Jul 2012, 5:10 am by tracey
ebookers.com Deutschland GmbH v Bundesverband der Verbraucherzentralen und Verbraucherverbände – Verbraucherzentrale Bundesverband eV: (Case C-112/11);  [2012] WLR (D)  217 “The concept of  ’optional price supplements’, referred to in the last sentence of article 23(1) of Parliament and Council Regulation (EC) No 1008/2008 of 24 September 2008 on common rules for the operation of air services in the Community, covered costs… [read post]
12 Mar 2010, 3:29 am by traceydennis
RTS Flexible Systems Ltd v Molkerei Alois Müller Gmbh & Co KG (UK Production) [2010] UKSC 14; [2010] WLR (D) 75 “A draft contractual agreement to install equipment in a factory, which was never executed as the work was commenced, completed and partly paid for during the negotiations, took effect as a binding contract as the essential terms had been agreed and neither party had intended agreement of the remaining terms to be a precondition to a concluded contract. [read post]
13 Oct 2008, 9:20 am
Directmedia Publishing GmbH v Albert-Ludwigs-Universität Freiburg (Case C-304/07); [2008] WLR (D) 312 “The ‘extraction’ of the contents of a database, which the database maker had the right to prevent, entailed an act of transfer of the contents to another medium, and included electronic copying and copying by a manual process. [read post]
27 May 2010, 2:13 pm by Tom Fisher
  In the Order, ALJ Charneski granted a joint motion filed by Complainants Cognex Corporation and Cognex Technology & Investment Corporation and Respondent Rasco GmbH (“Rasco”) to terminate the investigation as to Rasco based on a consent order and settlement agreement. [read post]
20 Apr 2015, 5:41 am by Frank J. Dürring
Nach §§ 97, 101, 20 InsO ist der Geschäftsführer einer GmbH verpflichtet, dem Insolvenzgericht, dem Insolvenzverwalter, dem Gläubigerausschuss und u. [read post]
20 Apr 2015, 5:41 am by Frank J. Dürring
Nach §§ 97, 101, 20 InsO ist der Geschäftsführer einer GmbH verpflichtet, dem Insolvenzgericht, dem Insolvenzverwalter, dem Gläubigerausschuss und u. [read post]
20 Apr 2015, 5:41 am by Nietzer
Nach §§ 97, 101, 20 InsO ist der Geschäftsführer einer GmbH verpflichtet, dem Insolvenzgericht, dem Insolvenzverwalter, dem Gläubigerausschuss und u. [read post]
11 May 2011, 3:08 am by sally
In re Rodenstock GmbH [2011] EWHC 1104; [2011] WLR (D) 150“Neither Council Regulation (EC) No 3046/2000 on insolvency proceedings (‘the Insolvency Regulation’) nor Council Regulation (EC) No 44/2001 on jurisdiction and the recognition and enforcement of judgments in civil and commercial matters (‘the Judgments Regulation’) had narrowed the court’s jurisdiction in relation to the sanctioning of schemes of arrangement, by impacting restrictively on the… [read post]
14 Dec 2010, 2:54 am by traceydennis
In re Nortel GmbH and related companies; In re Lehman Brothers International (Europe) (in administration) and related companies [2010] EWHC 3010 (Ch); [2010] WLR (D) 324 “Liabilities arising from the financial support direction (‘FSD’) regime created by the Pensions Act 2004 upon companies in administration or liquidation were payable as a liquidation or administration expense. [read post]