Search for: "GOLDSTEIN v. VIRGINIA" Results 61 - 80 of 207
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Sep 2013, 7:05 pm by Mary Dwyer
MacDonald 12-1490Issue: Whether the Virginia courts unreasonably applied Lawrence v. [read post]
7 Dec 2016, 4:09 am by Edith Roberts
Virginia State Board of Elections and McCrory v. [read post]
13 Aug 2013, 7:03 am by Mary Dwyer
United States 12-1185Issue: Whether, in light of the plain meaning of “threat” and the constitutional rule of Virginia v. [read post]
23 Mar 2007, 2:05 pm
Makor Issues & Rights Ltd. and Credit Suisse First Boston Ltd. v. [read post]
1 May 2013, 8:30 am by Conor McEvily
Goldstein, P.C., now known as Goldstein & Russell, P.C., whose attorneys work for or contribute to this blog in various capacities, was among the counsel to respondent Al Gore in that case.] [read post]
29 Jun 2011, 6:34 am by John Elwood
Virginia, 443 U.S. 307 (1979), following the Court’s two prior GVRs in this very case. [read post]
17 May 2016, 3:59 am by Amy Howe
 Other coverage of yesterday’s ruling in Zubik v. [read post]
7 Jan 2015, 10:52 am by Maureen Johnston
  Our policy is to include and disclose all cases in which Goldstein & Russell, P.C., whose attorneys contribute to this blog in various capacities, represents either a party or an amicus in the case, with the exception of the rare cases in which Goldstein & Russell represents the respondent(s) but does not appear on the briefs in the case. [read post]
20 May 2016, 7:20 am by Amy Howe
And in Luna Torres v. [read post]
18 Oct 2013, 4:43 am by Amy Howe
At Bloomberg View, Cass Sunstein discusses Schuette v. [read post]
3 Dec 2014, 7:23 am by Maureen Johnston
Virginia has based its decision on an unreasonable determination of facts under 28 U.S.C. [read post]
19 Jan 2016, 2:32 am by Amy Howe
[Disclosure:  Goldstein & Russell, P.C., whose attorneys contribute to this blog in various capacities, is among the counsel to the respondents in Heffernan v. [read post]
22 Mar 2016, 3:39 am by Amy Howe
Personhuballah, the challenge to a Virginia congressional district; and RJR Nabisco v. [read post]
13 Oct 2011, 5:22 am by SHG
  Rather, the problem is that cops are locking up people for seatbelt violations, or unpaid fines (or for mistakenly thinking a fine is unpaid), or for offenses that state law says don't warrant an arrest, such as Virginia v. [read post]
6 Nov 2018, 3:27 am by Edith Roberts
” Monday’s second case was Virginia Uranium, Inc. v. [read post]