Search for: "GOLDSTEIN v. VIRGINIA"
Results 61 - 80
of 207
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Mar 2017, 4:09 am
The justices issued an opinion on Wednesday in Bethune-Hill v. [read post]
7 Dec 2016, 4:09 am
Virginia State Board of Elections and McCrory v. [read post]
14 Oct 2016, 7:43 am
E.H., 15-1142 (challenging a West Virginia state law requiring the disclosure of patient records without patient authorization); and MCM Portfolio LLC v. [read post]
6 Oct 2016, 1:18 pm
West Virginia Dep’t of Health and Human Resources v. [read post]
6 Oct 2016, 8:29 am
West Virginia Dep’t of Health and Human Resources v. [read post]
12 Aug 2016, 6:06 am
Posted by V. [read post]
9 Aug 2016, 9:01 pm
Last week, in Gloucester County School Board v. [read post]
7 Jul 2016, 3:18 am
[Disclosure: Goldstein & Russell, P.C., whose attorneys contribute to this blog in various capacities, was among the counsel to the petitioners in Dollar General Stores v. [read post]
30 Jun 2016, 5:00 am
[Disclosure: Goldstein & Russell, P.C., whose attorneys contribute to this blog in various capacities, was among the counsel on an amicus brief in support of the respondents in Friedrichs v. [read post]
22 Jun 2016, 10:01 am
Fisher v. [read post]
19 Jun 2016, 7:52 pm
Utah v. [read post]
8 Jun 2016, 3:35 am
Virginia State Board of Elections. [read post]
3 Jun 2016, 8:13 am
District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia. [read post]
1 Jun 2016, 2:07 pm
Moore v. [read post]
31 May 2016, 3:52 am
” Adam Klasfeld of Courthouse News Service reports that, “[w]ith the Supreme Court likely to reverse Virginia Gov. [read post]
27 May 2016, 8:00 am
[Disclosure: Goldstein & Russell, P.C., whose attorneys contribute to this blog in various capacities, is among the counsel to the petitioner in this case.] [read post]
24 May 2016, 5:04 pm
Carpenter 15-1193Disclosure: Goldstein & Russell, P.C., whose attorneys contribute to this blog in various capacities, is among the counsel to the petitioner in this case.Issue: (1) Whether a court must categorically deny a Rule 60(b)(6) motion premised on the change in decisional law produced by Martinez v. [read post]
20 May 2016, 9:08 am
[Disclosure: Goldstein & Russell, P.C., whose attorneys contribute to this blog in various capacities, is among the counsel to the petitioner in this case.] [read post]
20 May 2016, 7:20 am
And in Luna Torres v. [read post]
19 May 2016, 4:06 am
Commentary on Monday’s decision in Spokeo v. [read post]
