Search for: "GOLDSTEIN v. VIRGINIA" Results 161 - 180 of 207
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Oct 2011, 5:23 am by Aaron Tang
Disclaimer: Goldstein & Russell, P.C. serves as counsel to the petitioner this case. [read post]
14 Oct 2016, 7:43 am by John Elwood
E.H., 15-1142 (challenging a West Virginia state law requiring the disclosure of patient records without patient authorization); and MCM Portfolio LLC v. [read post]
12 Oct 2017, 8:39 am by Aurora Barnes
Virginia 16-1348 Issue: Whether a defendant who consents to severance of multiple charges into sequential trials loses his right under the double jeopardy clause to the issue-preclusive effect of an acquittal. [read post]
24 May 2016, 5:04 pm by Kate Howard
Carpenter 15-1193Disclosure: Goldstein & Russell, P.C., whose attorneys contribute to this blog in various capacities, is among the counsel to the petitioner in this case.Issue: (1) Whether a court must categorically deny a Rule 60(b)(6) motion premised on the change in decisional law produced by Martinez v. [read post]
30 Oct 2012, 7:44 am by John Elwood
  (Disclaimer: Goldstein & Russell, P.C., serves as co-counsel to the petitioner.) [read post]
4 Dec 2014, 11:05 am by John Elwood
Virginia has based its decision on an unreasonable determination of facts under 28 U.S.C. [read post]
30 Jun 2010, 7:31 am by Kent Scheidegger
[Thomas] Goldstein said, noting campaign finance and Miranda rights as examples. [read post]
9 Jul 2013, 12:32 pm by Tom Goldstein and Dan Stein
Virginia, in which the Court held that the male-only admissions policy at the Virginia Military Institute was unconstitutional. [read post]
27 May 2016, 8:00 am by John Elwood
[Disclosure: Goldstein & Russell, P.C., whose attorneys contribute to this blog in various capacities, is among the counsel to the petitioner in this case.] [read post]
20 May 2016, 9:08 am by John Elwood
[Disclosure: Goldstein & Russell, P.C., whose attorneys contribute to this blog in various capacities, is among the counsel to the petitioner in this case.] [read post]
12 Oct 2017, 9:19 am by John Elwood
Virginia, 16-1348 Issue: Whether a defendant who consents to severance of multiple charges into sequential trials loses his right under the double jeopardy clause to the issue-preclusive effect of an acquittal. [read post]
16 Oct 2014, 7:57 am by John Elwood
Virginia has based its decision on an unreasonable determination of facts under 28 U.S.C. [read post]
2 May 2016, 2:37 am by Amy Howe
In The Economist, Steven Mazie looks back at last week’s decision in Heffernan v. [read post]
14 Jun 2017, 9:04 am by John Elwood
The court summarily reversed in Virginia v. [read post]