Search for: "GOWER v. SHORT"
Results 1 - 7
of 7
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Jan 2016, 1:13 pm
In short, don’t go there in the first place. [read post]
7 Dec 2006, 3:43 pm
Come, come, says Merpel, that's not a nice thing to say: this case would have been a great paradigm for anything the Gowers Review had to say about the length and expense of IP litigation.CC, AB and the letters of the lawAnother case recently posted on BAILII is CC v AB [2006] EWHC 3083 (QB), a decision of Mr Justice Eady from last Monday which would have been blogged earlier if it wasn't for the IPKat's insane distraction with the Gowers Review. [read post]
5 Feb 2017, 4:53 am
Iqbal v Iqbal [2017] EWCA Civ 19. [read post]
27 Dec 2010, 10:57 am
See Martin v. [read post]
8 Oct 2009, 8:45 am
So much for the enthusiastic efforts to implement recommendations of the Gowers Review, for support for the patent prosecution highway and for the government's deification of Wallace and Gromit]. [read post]
5 Jun 2012, 3:00 am
” In Yeager v. [read post]
27 Jul 2011, 7:53 pm
Only on that short ground the appeal is required to be allowed. [read post]
