Search for: "GRAND INCENTIVES, INC."
Results 41 - 60
of 111
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Mar 2019, 7:59 am
Amazon.com, Inc., 2019 WL 1128519 (W.D. [read post]
4 Dec 2023, 4:00 am
Consider the 2001 SCOTUS case of PGA Tour, Inc. v. [read post]
4 Apr 2014, 10:57 am
Georgia Highway Express, Inc., including time and labor required, the novelty and difficulty of the questions presented, the customary fee, the reputation of the attorneys involved, and awards in similar cases. [read post]
19 Aug 2010, 12:38 pm
Access a chart comparing the two proposed approaches (click here).Waste Information & Management Services, Inc. [read post]
8 Feb 2011, 10:51 pm
(IP Watch) (Michael Geist) UK: ‘Patent box’ tax incentives and SPCs in the UK (The SPC Blog) US: BIO commends Senate Judiciary Committee passage of Patent Reform Act of 2011 (PatentlyBIOtech) US: Sen. [read post]
10 Sep 2012, 1:17 am
I no financial relationship with United Realty Trust Inc. or any of its affiliates. [read post]
12 Aug 2014, 4:36 pm
This case opens up the discussion of whether the grand jury and these other jury rights should be constitutionally required. [read post]
20 Jul 2022, 5:01 am
And here too there are institutions that not only profit from the ability to freely debate the issue, but that have the ability and the incentive to rebut error: journalists, political activists, and the criticized government agencies themselves.[2] Indeed, when a government agency is accused of misconduct, its leaders will have huge incentives to rebut the accusations—both selfish incentives and public-regarding ones. [read post]
29 Sep 2017, 8:58 am
Grand Isle Shipyards, Inc. [read post]
29 Sep 2017, 8:58 am
Grand Isle Shipyards, Inc. [read post]
29 Sep 2017, 8:58 am
Grand Isle Shipyards, Inc. [read post]
4 Apr 2011, 7:37 am
(We have to assume that $150,000 gap is pretty much symbolic, in the grand scheme of things.) [read post]
3 Feb 2016, 7:31 am
We have written about the grand jury previously here, here and here. [read post]
3 Feb 2008, 10:42 pm
"[20] Such a default rule assumes shareholders to be "rationally apathetic" and lacking incentive to actively participate in decision-making.[21] Bainbridge' reasoning does not take into account those shareholders, such as AFSCME's who desire to initiate change to the bylaws. [read post]
1 Jan 2020, 9:00 am
Medicaid and Medicaid rely on medical services being based on the legitimate needs of the patient and not the profit incentive of the physicians. [read post]
27 Jul 2014, 5:30 am
Google Inc., 2014 BCCA 295 http://t.co/AFoj7A5GnO -> Google ordered by BC court to block websites: Equustek Solutions Inc. v. [read post]
9 Nov 2010, 12:03 pm
., Inc. v. [read post]
10 Jun 2020, 2:11 pm
It held that the transmission over the Internet of a musical work that results in a download of that work is not a communication by telecommunication: see also Rogers Communications Inc. v. [read post]
20 Jun 2010, 9:17 pm
The recent Federal Circuit case of Forest Group, Inc. v. [read post]
22 Apr 2019, 9:00 am
East Texas Medical Center Regional Health Services, Inc. [read post]
