Search for: "GRANT II v. BAKER III"
Results 1 - 20
of 97
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Apr 2020, 1:43 pm
Activities Prohibited During the moratorium, a court may not, for a “non-essential eviction,” (i) accept the filing of a summons or complaint, (ii) enter a judgment for possession for a plaintiff, (iii) issue an execution for possession, (iv) deny a request for a stay of execution or a continuance, or (v) schedule a court event, including a summary process trial. [read post]
3 Jul 2011, 7:02 am
In the end the Court denied defendant’s motion to dismiss Counts II and III, and granted defendant’s motion to dismiss Counts V, VI, and VII. [read post]
25 Jul 2017, 8:28 am
Justice Kennedy delivered the opinion of the Court with respect to Parts I, II, III, IV–A, and V, in which the Chief Justice and Justices Thomas and Alito joined. [read post]
19 Jan 2012, 6:00 am
III. [read post]
17 Jan 2013, 8:05 am
Framing the Article III Questions As Lyle has explained, when it granted certiorari last month in the Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA) and Proposition 8 cases, the Court conspicuously chose to add Article III questions to be briefed and considered in each case, in addition to the merits questions posed by the petitioners. [read post]
30 May 2008, 11:23 am
Myers, II v. [read post]
7 Oct 2015, 12:35 pm
This and other research papers authored by Professor Baker and Ms. [read post]
22 Apr 2016, 7:59 am
As the Supreme Court explained in Baker v. [read post]
5 Feb 2018, 9:58 am
Does societal welfare in the aggregate benefit from the grant of a temporary monopoly to the patentee (in most instances, the patentee being other than the inventor)? [read post]
4 Jan 2014, 7:00 am
Baker found to be simply “insane. [read post]
21 Apr 2020, 9:03 am
Except for emergency evictions, courts may not (i) accept a writ, summons, or complaint, (ii) enter a judgment, default judgment, or execution for possession, (iii) issue an execution for possession, (iv) deny a tenant’s request for a stay of execution or continuance of a summary process case, or (v) schedule any court event, including a summary process trial. [read post]
4 Dec 2006, 8:16 am
The district court granted summary judgment for the principal under Bethel School District v. [read post]
15 Apr 2017, 7:00 am
Kenneth Anderson flagged Professor Richard Armitage’s topic for this year’s 19th Annual Grotius Lecture at the ASIL Annual Meeting, and he also flagged the Supreme Court’s grant of certiorari in Jesner v. [read post]
27 Sep 2016, 4:20 pm
In Muwema, the plaintff sought three orders against Facebook: (i) to identify the person or persons behind the pseudonymous account, (ii) to take down the allegedly defamatory posts, and (iii) to prevent any similar posts from being reposted. [read post]
29 Jul 2012, 6:23 pm
(II) Whether the evidence was legally insufficient to support the findings of guilty to Charge III. [read post]
25 Jun 2018, 2:23 pm
After Baker v. [read post]
19 Jul 2012, 5:09 pm
Fortunately, the concurrences tried a little harder… II. [read post]
6 Oct 2008, 4:05 pm
March 13, 2008) the other is Wachovia Bank v. [read post]
25 Jul 2017, 5:09 am
Baker, 137 S. [read post]
14 Jan 2008, 10:56 am
Bryan Ratliff (NFP), a 12-page opinion, Chief Judge Baker writes:Appellant-respondent Julie A. [read post]
