Search for: "GRANT v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE" Results 61 - 80 of 300
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Mar 2022, 5:14 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
On Wednesday 23rd March the Court will hand down judgment in Commissioners for Her Majesty’s Revenue and Customs v NCL Investments Ltd and another, on appeal from 2020 EWCA Civ 663. [read post]
9 May 2011, 2:03 am by Blog Editorial
Commissioners for Her Majesty’s Revenue & Customs v Tower MCashback LLP 1 and another, heard 21 -22 February 2011. [read post]
23 Apr 2012, 2:34 am by Laura Sandwell, Matrix.
Humphreys v The Commissioners for Her Majesty’s Revenue and Customs, heard 14 – 15 March 2012. [read post]
1 Mar 2021, 1:00 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
On Tuesday 2 March, the Supreme Court will hear the case of Commissioners for Her Majesty’s Revenue and Customs v Tooth. [read post]
16 Nov 2020, 1:00 am by Jocelyn Hutton
Second, issues arising out of the case of Prudential Assurance Company Limited v Commissioners for Her Majesty’s Revenue and Customs [2018] UKSC 39. [read post]
25 Sep 2013, 11:21 am by Kelly Phillips Erb
Does the Internal Revenue Service have the right to regulate tax preparers? [read post]
20 Apr 2020, 2:00 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
Lehtimaki & Ors v Cooper, heard 14- 15 January 2020 Sainsbury’s Supermarkets Ltd v Visa Europe Services LLP & Ors, heard 20-23 January 2020 R V C, heard 27 January 2020 Peninsula Securities Ltd v Dunnes Stores (Bangor) Ltd (Northern Ireland), heard 28- 29 January 2020 Regeneron Pharmaceuticals Inc v Kymab Ltd, heard 11-12 February 2020 Royal Mencap Society v Tomlinson-Blake, heard 12- 13 February 2020 Shannon v… [read post]
17 Oct 2022, 1:34 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
Commissioners for His Majesty’s Revenue and Customs v NHS Lothian Health Board [2022] UKSC 28 – on appeal from [2020] CSIH 14 The Judgment will consider what is the correct approach that should be taken by the courts and tribunals to evidence and the burden and standard of proof in historical claims for the recovery of overpaid Value Added Tax. [read post]
4 Jul 2023, 11:38 pm by Josh Blackman
Oregon, and the Commissioner of Internal Revenue was not within his wheelhouse when he regulated health care tax credits in King v. [read post]
Commissioner of Internal Revenue is another procedural case, this one asking whether the 30-day time limit to file a petition for review with the Tax Court following a notice of determination from the IRS is a jurisdictional requirement or a claim-processing rule subject to equitable tolling. [read post]
29 Oct 2012, 7:09 am by David Oscar Markus
Perkins, 12-126),  clarification of how the Internal Revenue Service calculates the foreign tax credit (PPL Corporation v. [read post]
10 May 2021, 1:00 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
On Tuesday 11 and Wednesday 12 May, the Supreme Court will hear Tinkler v Commissioners for Her Majesty’s Revenue and Customs. [read post]
12 Mar 2015, 7:40 pm
In defense, respondent alleged the six-year limitation period provided in the 1939 Internal Revenue Code. [read post]
2 Mar 2015, 6:48 pm
In defense, respondent alleged the six-year limitation period provided in the 1939 Internal Revenue Code. [read post]
24 May 2020, 5:34 am by Nicholas Mosvick
In Steward, an Alabama corporation paid the tax required under the statute before filing a claim for refund with the Commissioner of Internal Revenue, claiming it could recover the payment because the statute was unconstitutional. [read post]
12 Dec 2022, 3:45 am by Matrix Law
The following Supreme Court judgments remain outstanding: (As of 16/12/22) The Law Debenture Trust Corporation plc v Ukraine (Represented by the Minister of Finance of Ukraine acting upon the instructions of the Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine) Nos. 2 and 3, heard 9-12 December 2019 East of England Ambulance Service NHS Trust v Flowers and Ors, heard 22 June 2021 Fearn and others v Board of Trustees of the Tate Gallery heard 7th December 2021 Stanford… [read post]
4 Oct 2008, 9:00 am
Commissioner Internal Revenue    Commissioner of Internal Revenue [read post]
3 May 2021, 1:00 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
The following Supreme Court judgments remain outstanding: The Law Debenture Trust Corporation plc v Ukraine (Represented by the Minister of Finance of Ukraine acting upon the instructions of the Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine) Nos. 2 and 3, heard 9-12 December 2019 Manchester Building Society (Appellant) v Grant Thornton UK LLP (Respondent), heard 13-14 October 2020 SC, CB and 8 children (Appellants) v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions and others… [read post]