Search for: "GRANT v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT"
Results 101 - 120
of 128
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Oct 2022, 10:01 am
Even an accidental distribution of such infused candies would constitute child endangerment and be subject to both negligence and strict liability actions in torts. ___________________________________________________________________________ I previously have written how the fear of razor blades in apples appears an urban legend. [read post]
2 Dec 2019, 7:52 am
Family Court Act § 412(2)(d) was amended to read as follows: (d) "income cap" shall mean up to and including one hundred eighty-four thousand dollars of the payor's annual income; provided, however, beginning March first, two thousand twenty and every two years thereafter, the income cap amount shall increase by the sum of the average annual percentage changes in the consumer … [read post]
7 Nov 2007, 7:43 am
This guide is a portion of United Cerebral Palsy's One-Stop Resource Guide. [read post]
28 Dec 2023, 9:05 pm
The termination of the national emergency will end waivers impacting several federal health programs, including Medicaid, Medicaid, and the Children’s Health Insurance Program (CHIP), as well as the Department of Housing and Urban Development’s COVID-19 mortgage forbearance program. [read post]
15 Jan 2019, 7:41 pm
A property owner sought a demolition permit (for an existing dilapidated home) and design approval for an eight-unit multi-family building. [read post]
5 Jul 2010, 7:59 pm
Brown and David Matusow, Bahr, et al. v. [read post]
5 Jun 2020, 3:00 am
Campaign Funds for Judges Warp Criminal Justice, Study Finds New York Times – Adam Liptak | Published: 6/1/2020 In Gideon v. [read post]
20 Aug 2018, 11:14 am
Protect Niles v. [read post]
5 Jan 2022, 3:00 am
Department of Water Resources, S258574. [read post]
13 Nov 2023, 5:05 am
In StarNet Insurance Co. v. [read post]
20 Apr 2010, 10:41 pm
‘‘(v) NARROWEST POSSIBLE SCOPE OFEXCEPTION. [read post]
21 Jul 2008, 10:53 pm
" Indiana: State v. [read post]
26 Jul 2010, 9:08 am
– Trading Markets.com, July 21, 2010 Consistent with Section 122 of the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act of 1980, as amended (“CERCLA”), 42 U.S.C. 9622(d), and 28 CFR 50.7, notice is hereby given that on July 16, 2010, the United States lodged a Consent Decree with 163 defendants (each of which is identified in the proposed Decree) in United States of America v. [read post]
6 Dec 2009, 9:11 pm
Click Here Center for Biological Diversity v. [read post]
29 Feb 2008, 8:00 am
, (EDTexweblog.com), (Patent Prospector), (Peter Zura's 271 Patent Blog), (IPBiz), (Against Monopoly), (Philip Brooks), (IPBiz), Indian government to consider whether to grant compulsory licenses to Natco for the exportation of generic versions of Tarceva and Sutent (Sunitinib) to Nepal : (Spicy IP), (Spicy IP), (Spicy IP), (Generic Pharmaceuticals & IP), (IP Law360), (Spicy IP),GlobalGlobal - GeneralIntellectual privilege or imaginary property? [read post]
18 Jul 2009, 7:31 am
At the same time, the SEC’s Inspector General has issued a number of reports critical of the agency, and Congress intensified pressure on the SEC and Department of Justice to bring cases in the wake of the financial crisis. [read post]
9 Oct 2018, 11:57 pm
It reasoned that the County’s incorporation by reference of the Department of Water Resources’ “minimum standards of well construction” intended to protect water quality, coupled with language in the local ordinance stating that well permits “shall be issued” if state and County standards are met, precluded the kind of discretion necessary to require compliance with CEQA. [read post]
23 Feb 2019, 12:35 pm
Data subsequent to the effective date may be considered in developing a retrospective value as a confirmation of trends that would reasonably be considered by a buyer or seller as of that date. [read post]
7 Jul 2010, 11:07 am
Writ granted in partand denied in part.Law Offices of Moses S. [read post]
13 Sep 2010, 8:43 am
But his administration’s decision on this case, Connecticut v. [read post]
