Search for: "GRAVES v. JACOBS"
Results 1 - 20
of 43
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Dec 2013, 8:31 am
He cannot.The case is Graves v. [read post]
10 Aug 2013, 6:07 am
In Acosta v Acosta--- F.3d ----, 2013 WL 3970239 (C.A.8 (Minn.)) [read post]
29 Jun 2007, 5:45 am
Rather belatedly passing on an interesting case I picked up on my Lawtel update a few days ago about getting an injunction in comparative advertising cases (Boehringer Ingelheim Ltd v Vetplus Ltd [2007] EWCA Civ 584 CA (Civ Div) (Pill LJ, Longmore LJ, Jacob LJ) 20/6/2007). [read post]
18 Jun 2012, 3:21 pm
In Acosta v Acosta, 2012 WL 2178982 (D.Minn.) [read post]
22 Jun 2008, 2:47 pm
United States v. [read post]
4 Jan 2012, 4:00 am
Oxford University Press, 1999, v. 2 [read post]
13 Jul 2008, 6:20 pm
United States v. [read post]
20 Apr 2017, 5:55 am
" The Court of Appeals says plaintiff has no case.The case is Cintron v. [read post]
6 Nov 2013, 9:03 am
Jacobs, the Supreme Court appeared ready to draw some lines to cabin the Younger abstention doctrine. [read post]
23 Sep 2021, 10:36 am
Alliance for Good Government v. [read post]
4 Feb 2015, 9:04 pm
In November I wrote in Jurist on a Third Circuit panel’s refusal to order that sports great Jim Thorpe be disinterred and reburied under provisions of the Native American Graves Protection and Repatriation Act (NAGPRA); in response, Elizabeth Varner, Diane Penneys Edelman and Leila Amineddoleh of the Lawyers’ Committee for Cultural Heritage Preservation argue that the panel could have based its result on specific language in the statute rather than via the roundabout path it did… [read post]
8 Mar 2010, 10:00 am
By Dov Jacobs Cross-post at Spreading the Jam Sorry for the non-francophone readers of this blog. [read post]
13 Jan 2016, 4:22 pm
The most important case was ironically one in which the media was not directly involved: City of Cape Town v. [read post]
29 Mar 2008, 5:28 pm
Simpson v. [read post]
20 May 2015, 7:15 am
My new book, The Grasping Hand: Kelo v. [read post]
17 Dec 2014, 3:40 am
Jacobs reports that, “[i]f coal companies get their way when the Supreme Court reviews U.S. [read post]
16 Apr 2013, 6:05 am
Adoptive Couple v. [read post]
5 Jul 2007, 2:26 am
Supreme Court has indeed ruled on laws of this nature, drawing the conclusion that you cite above in the 1982 Enmund v. [read post]
29 Jul 2014, 8:28 am
Jacobs considers what the Court’s ruling last month in Scialabba v. [read post]
12 May 2022, 7:17 am
Cal.) in Weiss v. [read post]
