Search for: "GRAY v. PENNSYLVANIA"
Results 101 - 120
of 151
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Aug 2019, 1:09 pm
Civil WarKalyani Ramnath, Harvard University (kalyaniramnath@fas.harvard.edu)Boats in a Storm: Law and Displacement in Postwar South AsiaEvan Taparata, University of Pennsylvania (taparata@sas.upenn.edu)State of Refuge: Refugee Law and the Modern United StatesAdnan Zulfiqar, Rutgers Law School (adnan.zulfiqar@rutgers.edu)Collective Duties in Islamic Law: The Moral Community, State Authority, and Ethical Speculation in the late 9th to the 14th Centuries CE8:30… [read post]
16 Jul 2007, 9:25 am
" (Ettinger v. [read post]
18 May 2010, 1:10 am
(Gray on Claims) District Court N D California: Compliance with accused industry standard does not justify joinder of defendants in a single action: Finisar Corporation v. [read post]
5 Jul 2017, 5:22 pm
More than a decade ago, the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania in Commonwealth v. [read post]
5 Jul 2007, 10:37 am
Levy-Gray, 894 A.2d 563, 577 (Md. 2006); Nolan v. [read post]
29 Nov 2010, 12:23 am
(Docket Report) District Court W D Pennsylvania: Intent to deceive element of false marking claim cannot be inferred from length of time since patent expired: United States of America, et. al. v. [read post]
4 Oct 2019, 10:31 am
The case against Monte Ward—Metropolitan Exhibition Co. v. [read post]
29 Mar 2010, 6:58 am
(Business IP and Intangible Asset Blog) US Patents – Decisions Split Federal Circuit panel finds preamble language not limiting: Marrin v Griffin (GRAY on Claims) (Inventive Step) District Court E D Texas: Inequitable conduct expert could not testify as to materiality absent qualification as a person skilled in the art: Advanced Technology Incubator, Inc v Sharp Corporation et al (Docket Report) District Court N D California: Intracompany patent transfer… [read post]
25 Jan 2019, 12:08 pm
Supreme Court’s 2018 decision in Murphy v. [read post]
26 Jul 2010, 12:39 am
Phoenix Fence Company (Docket Report) District Court E D Pennsylvania: False marking intent to deceive cannot be inferred from knowledge of the limited duration of patents and expiration of marked patents: Hollander v. [read post]
16 Nov 2018, 5:45 am
Nelson (University of Houston), and Roberto Tallarita (Harvard Law School), on Wednesday, November 14, 2018 Tags: Accountability, Citizens United v. [read post]
1 Apr 2011, 8:03 am
In May 2007, the Pennsylvania court issued an order approving the parties’ settlement agreement. [read post]
1 Mar 2014, 4:34 am
In the defamation case, Mann v. [read post]
11 Oct 2020, 6:30 am
This is just the way the “state unit” system works, whatever the Supreme Court had suggested in Gray v. [read post]
23 May 2013, 10:06 am
Levine) Jenia Iontcheva Turner – Effective Remedies for Ineffective Assistance of Counsel: A New Look After Lafler v. [read post]
30 Mar 2018, 6:01 am
Nuccio, Ropes & Gray LLP, on Wednesday, March 28, 2018 Tags: Banks, Financial institutions, Financial regulation, Foreign banks, Proprietary trading, Volcker Rule Do Proxies for Informed Trading Measure Informed Trading? [read post]
8 Mar 2011, 8:08 am
Justice Ginsburg added that a 2009 decision, District Attorney’s Office v. [read post]
6 Jun 2018, 5:46 pm
On May 21, 2018, in the case of Epic Systems Corp. v. [read post]
26 Sep 2021, 9:05 pm
Existing state laws authorized some of these actions; others occupied legal gray areas, as neither explicitly authorized nor explicitly prohibited. [read post]
4 Sep 2020, 6:31 am
Brownstein, Sabastian V. [read post]
