Search for: "GREENE v. HUMPHREY" Results 1 - 20 of 32
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Sep 2018, 11:45 pm by Nicholas Kaster
In addition, the Board did not err in excluding evidence that the applicant sought to introduce in a reply brief (Cai v. [read post]
12 Feb 2010, 3:07 am by traceydennis
Court of Appeal (Civil Division) Gibson & Ors v Sheffield City Council [2010] EWCA Civ 63 (10 February 2010) Green v Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government & Ors [2010] EWCA Civ 64 (10 February 2010) Online Catering Ltd v Acton & Anor [2010] EWCA Civ 58 (10 February 2010) Midgulf International Ltd v Groupe Chimique Tunisien [2010] EWCA Civ 66 (10 February 2010) Bascetta & Anor v Abbey National Plc [2010] EWCA Civ… [read post]
23 Jul 2015, 10:55 am by Rory Little
Humphrey:  Whether the Georgia courts erred in failing to recognize race discrimination under Batson v. [read post]
14 Jun 2007, 12:34 pm
Greene Ramifications on the discoverability principle The issue of whether ignorance of, or mistake of the extent of, injury is an appropriate basis for postponing a limitation period was considered by the Supreme Court of Canada in Peixeiro v. [read post]
24 Apr 2015, 7:29 am by John Elwood
After a thirty-five-year career as a letter carrier, the petitioner in Green v. [read post]
14 Sep 2010, 4:01 am
(Verizon) $1.67 billion in benefit costs due to a drafting error (scrivener's error) in its pension plan, according to the court.Campus police measures reviewed by committeeDuane Morris LLPThe House Judiciary Committee held a hearing on September 1, 2010 on two bills regarding campus police.Florida - Losing Florida Senate candidate files $500 million libel suitBrooks Pierce McLendon Humphrey & Leonard LLPJeff Greene, who was recently routed in his bid to win the Democratic… [read post]
24 Mar 2024, 5:19 am by Frank Cranmer
  Quick links Cloisters Chambers: Discrimination, belief and the “fundamental party rights”: the judgment in Ali v Green Party of England and Wales (i.e. [read post]
21 May 2012, 1:18 am by Sam Murrant
Humphreys v Revenue and Customs [2012] UKSC 18 Supreme Court: paying child tax credit to “main” care giver not discriminatory (under art.14 ECHR) to father who was caring for the child 3 days per week. [read post]
23 Nov 2017, 9:30 pm by Sarah Madigan
Supreme Court case, Christie v. [read post]