Search for: "GREENE v. USA" Results 121 - 140 of 488
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Nov 2017, 4:13 am by Edith Roberts
Greene’s Energy Group, a challenge to the constitutionality of the tribunal that conducts inter partes review, a process used by the U.S. [read post]
17 Jul 2018, 2:59 am by Walter Olson
“Why It Was Proper (and Necessary) to Overturn Old Precedent” [Ilya Shapiro and Aaron Barnes, Cato, earlier on Janus v. [read post]
16 Dec 2009, 6:58 am by Anna Christensen
Beretta USA Corp., a challenge to a 2005 law providing immunity to gun manufacturers. [read post]
24 Apr 2020, 7:08 am by Rebecca Green
A USA Today headline blared: “Harassment or Hail Mary? [read post]
27 Jun 2014, 7:51 am by Thomas Hopson
Rumsfeld, Rumsfeld v. [read post]
3 Jun 2022, 10:58 am by Public Employment Law Press
"An employee is constructively discharged when her or his employer, rather than discharging the plaintiff directly, deliberately created working conditions so intolerable that a reasonable person in the plaintiff's position would have felt compelled to resign" (Golston-Green v City of New York, 184 AD3d at 44; see Nelson v HSBC Bank USA, 41 AD3d 445, 447). [read post]
3 Jun 2022, 10:58 am by Public Employment Law Press
"An employee is constructively discharged when her or his employer, rather than discharging the plaintiff directly, deliberately created working conditions so intolerable that a reasonable person in the plaintiff's position would have felt compelled to resign" (Golston-Green v City of New York, 184 AD3d at 44; see Nelson v HSBC Bank USA, 41 AD3d 445, 447). [read post]
3 Jun 2022, 10:58 am by Public Employment Law Press
"An employee is constructively discharged when her or his employer, rather than discharging the plaintiff directly, deliberately created working conditions so intolerable that a reasonable person in the plaintiff's position would have felt compelled to resign" (Golston-Green v City of New York, 184 AD3d at 44; see Nelson v HSBC Bank USA, 41 AD3d 445, 447). [read post]
3 Jun 2022, 10:58 am by Public Employment Law Press
"An employee is constructively discharged when her or his employer, rather than discharging the plaintiff directly, deliberately created working conditions so intolerable that a reasonable person in the plaintiff's position would have felt compelled to resign" (Golston-Green v City of New York, 184 AD3d at 44; see Nelson v HSBC Bank USA, 41 AD3d 445, 447). [read post]
24 Nov 2019, 4:08 pm by INFORRM
The Labour, Green and Lib Dem manifestos include commitments to implementation of the Leveson proposals and the holding of Leveson Part 2. [read post]
7 Jan 2016, 4:38 am by Glenn Gerstell
  On their side was a 1979 Supreme Court ruling (Smith v. [read post]
26 Mar 2018, 9:14 am
Never Too Late 183 [week ending 18 February] Mr Justice Carr's L'Oreal v RN Ventures decision bristles with warnings on Actavis v Lilly claim interpretation, equivalents and prosecution history (Parts I and II) | Can Wenzhou and cigarette lighters tell us something about why there are IP rights? [read post]