Search for: "GRIEVES v. SUPERIOR COURT"
Results 41 - 45
of 45
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 May 2020, 2:20 am
The Court said that §80 of the Civil Service Law "reflects a legislative imperative" that the City was powerless to bargain away.As the Court of Appeals said in County of Chautauqua v. [read post]
7 Oct 2018, 8:59 am
An error of law by an administrative tribunal interpreting the Constitution can always be reviewed fully by a superior court. [read post]
16 Dec 2006, 2:06 pm
But my curmudgeonly fears were laid to rest earlier this week when the Supreme Court decided Carey v. [read post]
8 Oct 2014, 6:24 am
The defendants were protected by qualified immunity in all other respects (Raspardo v Carlone, October 6, 2014, Droney, C). [read post]
18 Mar 2011, 10:52 am
[viii] While the layoff rights of employees during a probationary period are superior to those of temporary and provisional appointees, they are subordinate to the layoff rights vested in tenured employees, i.e., individuals that have already satisfactorily completed their probationary period and individuals holding a contingent permanent appointment that have completed their probationary period. [read post]
