Search for: "GRIFFIN"
Results 61 - 80
of 4,409
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Feb 2024, 10:47 am
appeared first on Griffin Durham Tanner Clarkson. [read post]
19 Feb 2024, 10:02 am
“Griffin’s Case (1869) and The Enforcement Act of 1870: Justice Kavanaugh was right; Chief Justice Chase’s decision in Griffin’s Case ‘forms the backdrop against which Congress’ legislated The Enforcement Act of 1870. [read post]
19 Feb 2024, 8:14 am
" The Caesar Griffin Case, Staunton Spectator (12/15/1868) at 2. [read post]
18 Feb 2024, 6:55 pm
“Was Griffin’s Case the Backdrop Against Which Congress Legislated the Enforcement Act of 1870? [read post]
18 Feb 2024, 12:00 pm
It’s true that three members of Congress referenced Griffin’s Case in 1869–70. [read post]
17 Feb 2024, 3:39 am
The Foundation For Individual Rights and Expression, FIRE, also supports Standard 208, but as reflected in Senior Program Officer Mary Griffin’s statement, FIRE sees what Chemerinsky does not. [read post]
16 Feb 2024, 6:30 am
Supreme Court What directors need to know about the 2024 proxy season Posted by Jamie Smith, EY, on Wednesday, February 14, 2024 Tags: AI, Artificial intelligence, Board composition, board effectiveness, Boards of Directors, Climate change, Diversity, Engagement, ESG, Institutional Investors, investor stewardship, Proxy season, Proxy voting, Shareholder activism, Shareholder proposals, Shareholder voting, Sustainability Proxy Voting Guidelines 2024 Posted by Mark Lundvall and Ryan… [read post]
16 Feb 2024, 6:30 am
Supreme Court What directors need to know about the 2024 proxy season Posted by Jamie Smith, EY, on Wednesday, February 14, 2024 Tags: AI, Artificial intelligence, Board composition, board effectiveness, Boards of Directors, Climate change, Diversity, Engagement, ESG, Institutional Investors, investor stewardship, Proxy season, Proxy voting, Shareholder activism, Shareholder proposals, Shareholder voting, Sustainability Proxy Voting Guidelines 2024 Posted by Mark Lundvall and Ryan… [read post]
15 Feb 2024, 3:33 pm
First, it’s likely that many or all of the Justices will want to preserve states’ authority to prevent rebels and insurrectionists from holding state offices, as New Mexico did in the Couy Griffin case currently pending before the Court. [read post]
15 Feb 2024, 7:01 am
” Nick Griffin, the Executive Vice President for the DTLA Alliance, a coalition of more than 2,000 property owners downtown has also received multiple reports. [read post]
15 Feb 2024, 6:30 am
Griffin, Mr. [read post]
15 Feb 2024, 6:30 am
Griffin, Mr. [read post]
15 Feb 2024, 4:33 am
Griffin’s Case was decided more than a month later. [read post]
14 Feb 2024, 3:05 pm
The “Griffin’s Case” argument that Section 3 can only be enforced pursuant to a congressionally enacted statute (or, presumably, in a manner the Constitution itself authorizes, e.g., impeachment, or a House of Congress prohibiting an insurrectionist from sitting). [read post]
12 Feb 2024, 9:01 pm
For example, Justice Brett Kavanaugh repeatedly invoked Griffin’s Case, in which Chief Justice Salmon Chase, acting in his capacity as a lower court judge, ruled that Section 3 is not operative absent legislation by Congress. [read post]
12 Feb 2024, 9:51 am
Justice Sonia Sotomayor seemed skeptical about one argument made by Trump’s attorney, Jonathan Mitchell, that Chief Justice Samuel Chase’s circuit court decision in Griffin required Congress to pass enabling legislation to allow states to disqualify insurrectionists. [read post]
12 Feb 2024, 6:41 am
She pummeled Mitchell over his reliance on Griffin’s Case, his departure from the constitutional text, and his distortions of history. [read post]
12 Feb 2024, 1:02 am
On the same day, Richard Spearman KC dismissed the defamation claim in Griffin v North Cumbria Integrated Care NHS Foundation Trust. [read post]
11 Feb 2024, 10:55 am
Comedian Kathy Griffin has not only become persona non grata after her gory depiction of a beheaded Trump but she is now beseeching people to buy tickets for a languishing come-back tour. [read post]
9 Feb 2024, 3:48 pm
Again, he hedged on whether Griffin's Case was correct: "the answer to all three of those questions turns on whether this Court agrees with the holding of Griffin's Case. [read post]
